Compare
Granite Belt vs Ipswich Inner
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 101 km apart · Granite Belt profile · Ipswich Inner profile
Granite Belt Ipswich Inner
Granite Belt and Ipswich Inner are very different places. Residents in Granite Belt are far older, with a typical age of 47 compared to 36 in Ipswich Inner, and 26% of the population there is aged 65 or over. Housing patterns also vary widely; 41.9% of Granite Belt homes are owned outright, while 36.6% of homes in Ipswich Inner are rented. Ipswich Inner is more walkable (somewhat walkable) than Granite Belt (mostly car-dependent), offering far more public transport and a higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (55.1% versus 32.3%).
Everyday life shares some common ground, as both areas have similar proportions of First Nations people and almost identical rates of people needing help with daily activities. However, some gaps are growing. The age difference has widened since 2011, as has the gap in home ownership and the share of people with no religion, which is far higher in Ipswich Inner at 44.6%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 38,500
- First area, 2016: 40,101
- First area, 2021: 41,520
- Second area, 2011: 94,911
- Second area, 2016: 104,207
- Second area, 2021: 115,913
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Granite Belt: 1.1% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Ipswich Inner: 0.6% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Granite Belt: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Ipswich Inner: 0.8% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Granite Belt: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Ipswich Inner: 1.3% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Granite Belt: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 70–74 in Ipswich Inner: 1.8% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in Granite Belt: 3.8% males, 3.9% females; 65–69 in Ipswich Inner: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Granite Belt: 3.7% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Ipswich Inner: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Granite Belt: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Ipswich Inner: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Granite Belt: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Ipswich Inner: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Granite Belt: 2.7% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Ipswich Inner: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Granite Belt: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Ipswich Inner: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Granite Belt: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 35–39 in Ipswich Inner: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Granite Belt: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 30–34 in Ipswich Inner: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 25–29 in Granite Belt: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Ipswich Inner: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Granite Belt: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Ipswich Inner: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Granite Belt: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Ipswich Inner: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Granite Belt: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Ipswich Inner: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Granite Belt: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Ipswich Inner: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 0–4 in Granite Belt: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Ipswich Inner: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $446
- First area, 2016: $510
- First area, 2021: $595
- Second area, 2011: $565
- Second area, 2016: $640
- Second area, 2021: $766
- First area, 2011: $841
- First area, 2016: $988
- First area, 2021: $1,127
- Second area, 2011: $1,166
- Second area, 2016: $1,325
- Second area, 2021: $1,549
- First area, 2011: $1,003
- First area, 2016: $1,226
- First area, 2021: $1,417
- Second area, 2011: $1,367
- Second area, 2016: $1,549
- Second area, 2021: $1,896
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $195
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $255
- Second area, 2011: $260
- Second area, 2016: $280
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,647
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Granite Belt with nearby areas
Compare Ipswich Inner with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Granite Belt vs Ipswich Inner [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/30703/granite-belt/vs/31003/ipswich-inner