Compare
Arundel vs Oxenford - Maudsland
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 7.3 km apart · Arundel profile · Oxenford - Maudsland profile
Arundel Oxenford - Maudsland
Oxenford - Maudsland and Arundel are neighbouring areas on the Gold Coast with very different profiles. Oxenford - Maudsland is a younger area where the typical resident is 36, and 22.4% of the population are children under 15. In contrast, Arundel is noticeably older, with a typical age of 41 and a much higher share of seniors at 20.2%. Arundel is also more diverse, with 21.2% of people using a language other than English at home compared to 10.4% in Oxenford - Maudsland.
The gap in typical ages has widened since 2011, reflecting how these two areas are drifting apart. Despite this, they share many similarities, including nearly identical proportions of First Nations residents and people who volunteer. Both areas also have a similar share of people earning $2,000 or more per week. While Arundel is more accessible by public transport, Oxenford - Maudsland has more homes within a 15-minute walk of a school.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 9,575
- First area, 2016: 10,246
- First area, 2021: 11,171
- Second area, 2011: 14,370
- Second area, 2016: 15,795
- Second area, 2021: 17,920
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Arundel: 0.9% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Oxenford - Maudsland: 0.3% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Arundel: 1.4% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Arundel: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 1.1% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Arundel: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Arundel: 2.2% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Arundel: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Arundel: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Arundel: 3.1% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Arundel: 2.9% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Arundel: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 3.7% males, 4.1% females
- 35–39 in Arundel: 2.6% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 3.6% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Arundel: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Arundel: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Arundel: 3.7% males, 3.1% females; 20–24 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Arundel: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Arundel: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 4.2% males, 3.9% females
- 5–9 in Arundel: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 4.1% males, 3.5% females
- 0–4 in Arundel: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Oxenford - Maudsland: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $559
- First area, 2016: $615
- First area, 2021: $715
- Second area, 2011: $624
- Second area, 2016: $714
- Second area, 2021: $844
- First area, 2011: $1,273
- First area, 2016: $1,408
- First area, 2021: $1,682
- Second area, 2011: $1,384
- Second area, 2016: $1,677
- Second area, 2021: $2,040
- First area, 2011: $1,351
- First area, 2016: $1,563
- First area, 2021: $1,878
- Second area, 2011: $1,488
- Second area, 2016: $1,794
- Second area, 2021: $2,187
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $375
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $470
- Second area, 2011: $375
- Second area, 2016: $410
- Second area, 2021: $445
- First area, 2011: $2,095
- First area, 2016: $1,800
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,100
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Arundel with nearby areas
Compare Oxenford - Maudsland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Arundel vs Oxenford - Maudsland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/309031235/arundel/vs/309071256/oxenford-maudsland