Compare
Emerald vs Charleville
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 343 km apart · Emerald profile · Charleville profile
Emerald Charleville
Charleville and Emerald are two different kinds of Queensland centres. Charleville has a much older population, with a typical resident aged 43 and 19.3% of people aged 65 and over. It is also more affordable, with a typical weekly household income of $1,294 and a typical weekly rent of $170. In contrast, Emerald is much younger, with a typical age of 32, and is wealthier, with typical weekly incomes of $2,190. Emerald also has a higher share of people working or looking for work (73.7%) and a larger proportion of residents who have completed Year 12 (53.8%).
Both areas sit near the national figure for overall advantage. They also share similar unemployment rates, and the proportion of people employed full-time is almost the same in both places. While these similarities exist, some gaps are widening; the difference in typical age has grown to 11 years since 2011, and the gap in Year 12 completion has also increased.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 13,218
- First area, 2016: 13,532
- First area, 2021: 14,089
- Second area, 2011: 4,619
- Second area, 2016: 4,307
- Second area, 2021: 3,971
- First area, 2011: 29 yrs
- First area, 2016: 31 yrs
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emerald: 0.2% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Charleville: 1.2% males, 1.5% females
- 80–84 in Emerald: 0.2% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in Charleville: 1.1% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Emerald: 0.7% males, 0.5% females; 75–79 in Charleville: 1.1% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Emerald: 0.9% males, 0.9% females; 70–74 in Charleville: 2.3% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Emerald: 1.5% males, 1.3% females; 65–69 in Charleville: 4.0% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Emerald: 2.6% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Charleville: 4.4% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Emerald: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Charleville: 4.3% males, 4.7% females
- 50–54 in Emerald: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Charleville: 2.6% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Emerald: 3.4% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Charleville: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Emerald: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Charleville: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 35–39 in Emerald: 4.3% males, 4.4% females; 35–39 in Charleville: 2.0% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Emerald: 4.0% males, 4.0% females; 30–34 in Charleville: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Emerald: 4.0% males, 3.9% females; 25–29 in Charleville: 3.3% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Emerald: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 20–24 in Charleville: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Emerald: 3.7% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Charleville: 2.6% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Emerald: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in Charleville: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Emerald: 4.4% males, 4.6% females; 5–9 in Charleville: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Emerald: 3.8% males, 3.9% females; 0–4 in Charleville: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $918
- First area, 2016: $873
- First area, 2021: $1,033
- Second area, 2011: $569
- Second area, 2016: $672
- Second area, 2021: $798
- First area, 2011: $2,317
- First area, 2016: $1,884
- First area, 2021: $2,190
- Second area, 2011: $978
- Second area, 2016: $1,115
- Second area, 2021: $1,294
- First area, 2011: $2,478
- First area, 2016: $2,134
- First area, 2021: $2,510
- Second area, 2011: $1,262
- Second area, 2016: $1,490
- Second area, 2021: $1,766
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $328
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $130
- Second area, 2016: $158
- Second area, 2021: $170
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $1,600
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $997
- Second area, 2021: $867
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Emerald with nearby areas
Compare Charleville with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emerald vs Charleville [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/308011192/emerald/vs/315031409/charleville