Compare
Roma vs Charleville
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 232 km apart · Roma profile · Charleville profile
Roma Charleville
Roma and Charleville are two distinct Queensland towns with very different age and housing profiles. Roma is a younger area where the typical resident is 35, while residents in Charleville are far older with a typical age of 43. This age gap is reflected in the families; Roma has a well higher share of children under 15 (21.5%) and a far higher proportion of renters (45.4%). In contrast, people in Charleville are much more likely to own their homes outright (38.5%) and far more of them are aged 65 or over (19.3%).
Everyday life in both towns shares many similarities, such as almost identical proportions of First Nations people and those who volunteer. However, the gap between the two has grown in several areas since 2011. For example, the difference in typical ages has widened to 8 years, and the gap in the share of people who have moved recently has grown to 11 points, with Roma being far higher. While both are car-dependent, Roma has better access to groceries and parks within a 15-minute walk.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 6,906
- First area, 2016: 6,848
- First area, 2021: 6,838
- Second area, 2011: 4,619
- Second area, 2016: 4,307
- Second area, 2021: 3,971
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Roma: 0.5% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Charleville: 1.2% males, 1.5% females
- 80–84 in Roma: 0.7% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Charleville: 1.1% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Roma: 1.0% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Charleville: 1.1% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Roma: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Charleville: 2.3% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Roma: 2.1% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Charleville: 4.0% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Roma: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Charleville: 4.4% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Roma: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Charleville: 4.3% males, 4.7% females
- 50–54 in Roma: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Charleville: 2.6% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Roma: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Charleville: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Roma: 2.9% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Charleville: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 35–39 in Roma: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Charleville: 2.0% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Roma: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Charleville: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Roma: 3.5% males, 3.9% females; 25–29 in Charleville: 3.3% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Roma: 4.0% males, 4.0% females; 20–24 in Charleville: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Roma: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Charleville: 2.6% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Roma: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Charleville: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Roma: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Charleville: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Roma: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 0–4 in Charleville: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $716
- First area, 2016: $818
- First area, 2021: $957
- Second area, 2011: $569
- Second area, 2016: $672
- Second area, 2021: $798
- First area, 2011: $1,400
- First area, 2016: $1,509
- First area, 2021: $1,706
- Second area, 2011: $978
- Second area, 2016: $1,115
- Second area, 2021: $1,294
- First area, 2011: $1,629
- First area, 2016: $1,842
- First area, 2021: $2,171
- Second area, 2011: $1,262
- Second area, 2016: $1,490
- Second area, 2021: $1,766
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $215
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2011: $130
- Second area, 2016: $158
- Second area, 2021: $170
- First area, 2011: $1,500
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $997
- Second area, 2021: $867
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Roma with nearby areas
Compare Charleville with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Roma vs Charleville [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/307011176/roma/vs/315031409/charleville