Compare
Inglewood - Waggamba vs Roma
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 220 km apart · Inglewood - Waggamba profile · Roma profile
Inglewood - Waggamba Roma
Roma and Inglewood - Waggamba are two Queensland areas with very different profiles. Roma is younger and more active, with a typical resident aged 35 and a typical weekly income of $957. It is also more urban, with 62.3% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and a walkability score of 3.7 (mostly car-dependent). In contrast, Inglewood - Waggamba is much older, with a typical age of 45 and lower typical weekly incomes of $592. It is far more car-dependent (score 1.6), and 42.7% of homes are owned outright compared to 24.7% in Roma.
Everyday life in both places shares several traits, including very similar population growth and almost identical unemployment rates. They also both lack public transport stops and share a similar climate with average maximum temperatures around 29 degrees. However, the gaps between them are often widening; the difference in typical income and the gap in home ownership have both grown since 2011. This is consistent with Roma's more transient population, as 44.4% of its residents moved there in the last five years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,193
- First area, 2016: 4,244
- First area, 2021: 4,065
- Second area, 2011: 6,906
- Second area, 2016: 6,848
- Second area, 2021: 6,838
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Inglewood - Waggamba: 1.3% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Roma: 0.5% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 1.6% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Roma: 0.7% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 2.4% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Roma: 1.0% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 3.0% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Roma: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 4.2% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Roma: 2.1% males, 1.9% females
- 60–64 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 4.5% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Roma: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Roma: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Roma: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Roma: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 40–44 in Roma: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Roma: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Roma: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 2.7% males, 2.2% females; 25–29 in Roma: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Roma: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 15–19 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Roma: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Roma: 3.2% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Roma: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Inglewood - Waggamba: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Roma: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $466
- First area, 2016: $537
- First area, 2021: $592
- Second area, 2011: $716
- Second area, 2016: $818
- Second area, 2021: $957
- First area, 2011: $840
- First area, 2016: $1,031
- First area, 2021: $1,118
- Second area, 2011: $1,400
- Second area, 2016: $1,509
- Second area, 2021: $1,706
- First area, 2011: $1,001
- First area, 2016: $1,220
- First area, 2021: $1,381
- Second area, 2011: $1,629
- Second area, 2016: $1,842
- Second area, 2021: $2,171
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $100
- First area, 2016: $110
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2011: $215
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $900
- First area, 2016: $867
- First area, 2021: $867
- Second area, 2011: $1,500
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Inglewood - Waggamba with nearby areas
Compare Roma with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Inglewood - Waggamba vs Roma [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/307011174/inglewood-waggamba/vs/307011176/roma