Compare
Port Hedland vs Upper Gascoyne
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 501 km apart · Port Hedland profile · Upper Gascoyne profile
Port Hedland Upper Gascoyne
Port Hedland and Upper Gascoyne are distant Western Australian areas with very different profiles. Port Hedland is a larger hub where typical weekly household incomes are far higher at $2,865, compared to $1,300 in Upper Gascoyne. Port Hedland also has a far higher share of people born overseas (20.6% versus 5.9%) and larger schools, with an average size of 352 students compared to just 31 in Upper Gascoyne. In contrast, Upper Gascoyne is sparsely populated and has a far higher Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population, which sits at 55.9% compared to 18.6% in Port Hedland.
Both areas are almost identical in the share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher, at around 12%. This shared education level sits alongside a widening gap in housing, as Port Hedland has seen its share of renters rise far above Upper Gascoyne. While income gaps have narrowed since 2011, Port Hedland remains much more likely to have adults working or looking for work. Public transport is far more common in Port Hedland, whereas Upper Gascoyne has no public transport stops per 1,000 people.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 15,044
- First area, 2016: 14,469
- First area, 2021: 15,684
- Second area, 2011: 251
- Second area, 2016: 278
- Second area, 2021: 170
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 31 yrs
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 27 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 26 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Port Hedland: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Upper Gascoyne: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.1% females; 80–84 in Upper Gascoyne: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 75–79 in Upper Gascoyne: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Port Hedland: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 70–74 in Upper Gascoyne: 2.6% males, 3.2% females
- 65–69 in Port Hedland: 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 65–69 in Upper Gascoyne: 2.6% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Port Hedland: 2.6% males, 1.6% females; 60–64 in Upper Gascoyne: 6.4% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Port Hedland: 3.6% males, 2.6% females; 55–59 in Upper Gascoyne: 9.6% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Upper Gascoyne: 6.4% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Port Hedland: 3.7% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Upper Gascoyne: 2.6% males, 1.9% females
- 40–44 in Port Hedland: 4.1% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Upper Gascoyne: 3.8% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Port Hedland: 5.4% males, 5.0% females; 35–39 in Upper Gascoyne: 1.9% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Port Hedland: 5.4% males, 5.4% females; 30–34 in Upper Gascoyne: 0.0% males, 5.8% females
- 25–29 in Port Hedland: 4.2% males, 4.5% females; 25–29 in Upper Gascoyne: 0.0% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Port Hedland: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Upper Gascoyne: 1.9% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Port Hedland: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Upper Gascoyne: 2.6% males, 3.8% females
- 10–14 in Port Hedland: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Upper Gascoyne: 3.8% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Port Hedland: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 5–9 in Upper Gascoyne: 2.6% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Port Hedland: 4.6% males, 4.4% females; 0–4 in Upper Gascoyne: 5.1% males, 6.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,421
- First area, 2016: $1,355
- First area, 2021: $1,532
- Second area, 2011: $311
- Second area, 2016: $419
- Second area, 2021: $484
- First area, 2011: $2,809
- First area, 2016: $2,563
- First area, 2021: $2,865
- Second area, 2011: $862
- Second area, 2016: $966
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: $2,944
- First area, 2016: $3,014
- First area, 2021: $3,264
- Second area, 2011: $650
- Second area, 2016: $700
- Second area, 2021: $1,312
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.2
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $120
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $225
- Second area, 2011: $50
- Second area, 2016: $30
- Second area, 2021: $75
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,693
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $826
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.40
- Second area, 2016: 1.10
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Port Hedland with nearby areas
Compare Upper Gascoyne with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Port Hedland vs Upper Gascoyne [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA57280/port-hedland/vs/LGA58470/upper-gascoyne