Compare
Ashburton vs Port Hedland
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 263 km apart · Ashburton profile · Port Hedland profile
Ashburton Port Hedland
Port Hedland and Ashburton are both regional Western Australian areas with high proportions of First Nations people, though Port Hedland's share is well higher at 18.6%. Port Hedland is more urbanised, with a typical weekly rent of $225 and a workforce with higher education and job skills. In contrast, Ashburton is more rural, with a typical rent of just $48 and a far higher share of separate houses (86.7% compared to 70.2%). Ashburton also has far more people earning $2,000 or more a week (36.1%) and a much higher First Nations median personal income of $1,129.
Everyday life in both places shares many similarities, as typical weekly household incomes are very close at $2,865 in Port Hedland and $2,937 in Ashburton. They also have nearly identical shares of people aged 65 and over and those who served in the Defence Force. While both areas sit well above the national figure for high earners, the gap between them is narrowing. However, the difference in housing costs has widened since 2011, as rent in Port Hedland has risen much faster than in Ashburton.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 10,001
- First area, 2016: 13,026
- First area, 2021: 7,391
- Second area, 2011: 15,044
- Second area, 2016: 14,469
- Second area, 2021: 15,684
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ashburton: 0.0% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Port Hedland: 0.1% males, 0.1% females
- 80–84 in Ashburton: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 80–84 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.1% females
- 75–79 in Ashburton: 0.4% males, 0.1% females; 75–79 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 70–74 in Ashburton: 0.4% males, 0.4% females; 70–74 in Port Hedland: 0.5% males, 0.5% females
- 65–69 in Ashburton: 1.1% males, 0.8% females; 65–69 in Port Hedland: 1.1% males, 0.9% females
- 60–64 in Ashburton: 2.7% males, 1.7% females; 60–64 in Port Hedland: 2.6% males, 1.6% females
- 55–59 in Ashburton: 3.8% males, 2.0% females; 55–59 in Port Hedland: 3.6% males, 2.6% females
- 50–54 in Ashburton: 4.3% males, 2.3% females; 50–54 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Ashburton: 4.7% males, 2.5% females; 45–49 in Port Hedland: 3.7% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Ashburton: 5.4% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Port Hedland: 4.1% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Ashburton: 6.8% males, 4.8% females; 35–39 in Port Hedland: 5.4% males, 5.0% females
- 30–34 in Ashburton: 6.8% males, 5.3% females; 30–34 in Port Hedland: 5.4% males, 5.4% females
- 25–29 in Ashburton: 4.7% males, 3.7% females; 25–29 in Port Hedland: 4.2% males, 4.5% females
- 20–24 in Ashburton: 2.9% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Port Hedland: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Ashburton: 1.9% males, 1.6% females; 15–19 in Port Hedland: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Ashburton: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 10–14 in Port Hedland: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Ashburton: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 5–9 in Port Hedland: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Ashburton: 4.5% males, 4.3% females; 0–4 in Port Hedland: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,873
- First area, 2016: $2,381
- First area, 2021: $1,865
- Second area, 2011: $1,421
- Second area, 2016: $1,355
- Second area, 2021: $1,532
- First area, 2011: $2,705
- First area, 2016: $2,456
- First area, 2021: $2,937
- Second area, 2011: $2,809
- Second area, 2016: $2,563
- Second area, 2021: $2,865
- First area, 2011: $2,831
- First area, 2016: $2,889
- First area, 2021: $3,310
- Second area, 2011: $2,944
- Second area, 2016: $3,014
- Second area, 2021: $3,264
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $30
- First area, 2016: $32
- First area, 2021: $48
- Second area, 2011: $120
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $225
- First area, 2011: $954
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $1,613
- Second area, 2011: $2,600
- Second area, 2016: $2,693
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Ashburton with nearby areas
Compare Port Hedland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ashburton vs Port Hedland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA50250/ashburton/vs/LGA57280/port-hedland