Compare
Broome vs Port Hedland
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 477 km apart · Broome profile · Port Hedland profile
Broome Port Hedland
Broome and Port Hedland are two distinct hubs in Western Australia. Port Hedland is a high-earning centre where 42.5% of households earn $3,000 or more a week, compared to 25.6% in Broome. Port Hedland also has much better public transport, with 92% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a stop, while Broome has no such access. In contrast, Broome is more walkable for daily needs, as 67.8% of homes are near groceries compared to just 26.2% in Port Hedland. Broome also has a larger First Nations population at 28.6% and a higher share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher (20.2% versus 12.8% in Port Hedland).
Both areas are very similar in their home sizes, with a typical 2.7 people per home, and they share nearly identical rates of long-term health conditions. While they have much in common, the income gap has narrowed since 2011, and the difference in the proportion of First Nations residents has also shrunk. This trend suggests that while Port Hedland remains the wealthier of the two, the economic distance between them is slowly closing.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 14,997
- First area, 2016: 16,222
- First area, 2021: 16,959
- Second area, 2011: 15,044
- Second area, 2016: 14,469
- Second area, 2021: 15,684
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Broome: 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Port Hedland: 0.1% males, 0.1% females
- 80–84 in Broome: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.1% females
- 75–79 in Broome: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 70–74 in Broome: 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 70–74 in Port Hedland: 0.5% males, 0.5% females
- 65–69 in Broome: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Port Hedland: 1.1% males, 0.9% females
- 60–64 in Broome: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Port Hedland: 2.6% males, 1.6% females
- 55–59 in Broome: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Port Hedland: 3.6% males, 2.6% females
- 50–54 in Broome: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Broome: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Port Hedland: 3.7% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Broome: 3.4% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Port Hedland: 4.1% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Broome: 3.9% males, 4.8% females; 35–39 in Port Hedland: 5.4% males, 5.0% females
- 30–34 in Broome: 4.2% males, 5.2% females; 30–34 in Port Hedland: 5.4% males, 5.4% females
- 25–29 in Broome: 3.2% males, 4.3% females; 25–29 in Port Hedland: 4.2% males, 4.5% females
- 20–24 in Broome: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Port Hedland: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Broome: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Port Hedland: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Broome: 4.1% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Port Hedland: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Broome: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Port Hedland: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Broome: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Port Hedland: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $779
- First area, 2016: $898
- First area, 2021: $1,078
- Second area, 2011: $1,421
- Second area, 2016: $1,355
- Second area, 2021: $1,532
- First area, 2011: $1,610
- First area, 2016: $1,796
- First area, 2021: $2,091
- Second area, 2011: $2,809
- Second area, 2016: $2,563
- Second area, 2021: $2,865
- First area, 2011: $1,809
- First area, 2016: $2,076
- First area, 2021: $2,428
- Second area, 2011: $2,944
- Second area, 2016: $3,014
- Second area, 2021: $3,264
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $193
- First area, 2016: $265
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $120
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $225
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,573
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $2,600
- Second area, 2016: $2,693
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Broome with nearby areas
Compare Port Hedland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Broome vs Port Hedland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA50980/broome/vs/LGA57280/port-hedland