Compare
Bathurst vs Blue Mountains
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 90 km apart · Bathurst profile · Blue Mountains profile
Bathurst Blue Mountains
Bathurst and Blue Mountains are both large regional areas in New South Wales, though they differ in their layout and community profiles. The Blue Mountains has a far higher rate of First Nations Year 12 completion at 46.6%, compared to 30.7% in Bathurst. The Blue Mountains also has a far higher street connectivity score of 14 intersections per square kilometre, while Bathurst has just 2. In the Blue Mountains, First Nations household income is well higher at $2,022, whereas in Bathurst it is $1,512.
Both areas have a First Nations population with the same typical age of 23, a figure that sits near the national level for this group. This shared demographic profile exists alongside different levels of accessibility. The Blue Mountains is more walkable, with far more homes within a 15-minute walk of a park (92.4% compared to 79.7% in Bathurst). Meanwhile, Bathurst has a well larger First Nations population at 3,158 people, compared to 2,097 in the Blue Mountains.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Bathurst with nearby areas
Compare Blue Mountains with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bathurst vs Blue Mountains [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE105003/bathurst/vs/IARE107004/blue-mountains