Compare
Blue Mountains vs Camden
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 48 km apart · Blue Mountains profile · Camden profile
Blue Mountains Camden
Blue Mountains and Camden are two regional areas in New South Wales with very different layouts. Blue Mountains is far more walkable, with 60.2% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a variety of services and 46.6% of homes near health services, compared to 44.0% and 22.5% in Camden. In contrast, Camden has much higher street connectivity, with 64 intersections per square kilometre against just 14 in Blue Mountains. Camden also has a far larger First Nations population, with 3,925 people compared to 2,097 in Blue Mountains.
Everyday life in both places is similar when it comes to green space, as over 91% of homes in each area are within a 15-minute walk of a park. While Blue Mountains is generally more walkable and has a higher share of First Nations people speaking a traditional language, Camden has a younger First Nations population and slightly higher typical incomes for these residents.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Blue Mountains with nearby areas
Compare Camden with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blue Mountains vs Camden [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE107004/blue-mountains/vs/IARE107006/camden