Compare

Blue Mountains vs Liverpool

Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 46 km apart · Blue Mountains profile · Liverpool profile

Blue Mountains Liverpool

Blue Mountains and Liverpool are both located in New South Wales, but they offer very different living environments. Liverpool is more walkable, with a "very walkable" score of 6.2 and a far higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (72.8%) and schools (85.1%) compared to Blue Mountains. In contrast, the Blue Mountains has a much steeper terrain slope of 10.8% and far fewer street intersections per square kilometre. There are also notable differences among First Nations residents; the Blue Mountains has a well higher typical personal income of $718 and a Year 12 completion rate of 46.6%, while First Nations unemployment is well higher in Liverpool at 10.9%.

Everyday life in both places shares a strong connection to nature, as over 91% of homes in each area are within a 15-minute walk of a park. While both areas are relatively well-connected to public transport, the gap between them is slightly wider in Liverpool, where 90.2% of homes are within a 10-minute walk of a stop compared to 86.5% in Blue Mountains.

First Nations

First Nations people in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +1,680 larger in Liverpool
2,097 73rd pct 3,777 86th pct
Median age in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +1 yrs older in Blue Mountains
23 yrs 29th pct 22 yrs 14th pct
Year 12 in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +9.8 pts higher in Blue Mountains
46.6% 85th pct 36.8% 64th pct
Unemployment in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +4.9 pts higher in Liverpool
6.0% 5th pct 10.9% 37th pct
Median income in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +$191 higher in Blue Mountains
$718 87th pct $527 48th pct
Household income in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +$563 higher in Blue Mountains
$2,022 90th pct $1,459 60th pct
Indigenous language in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +1.5 pts higher in Blue Mountains
7.1% 54th pct 5.6% 44th pct

Walkability

Walk score in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +0.6 higher in Liverpool
5.5 76th pct 6.2 82nd pct
Types ≤15 min in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +0.5 more in Liverpool
5.3 76th pct 5.8 81st pct
15-min city in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +14.6 pts higher in Liverpool
60.2% 71st pct 74.8% 80th pct
Walk to shops in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +19.8 pts higher in Liverpool
52.9% 57th pct 72.8% 77th pct
Walk to transit in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +3.7 pts higher in Liverpool
86.5% 77th pct 90.2% 81st pct
Walk to school in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +24.4 pts higher in Liverpool
60.7% 54th pct 85.1% 80th pct
Walk to a park in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +0.9 pts higher in Blue Mountains
92.4% 72nd pct 91.5% 70th pct
Walk to health in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +1.7 pts higher in Liverpool
46.6% 62nd pct 48.4% 65th pct
Intersections/km² in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +46 higher in Liverpool
14 65th pct 60 77th pct
Mean slope in Blue Mountainsin Liverpool +6.3 pts higher in Blue Mountains
10.8% 100th pct 4.5% 46th pct

Compare Blue Mountains with nearby areas

Compare Liverpool with nearby areas

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blue Mountains vs Liverpool [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE107004/blue-mountains/vs/IARE107017/liverpool