Compare
Blue Mountains vs Hawkesbury
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 51 km apart · Blue Mountains profile · Hawkesbury profile
Blue Mountains Hawkesbury
Blue Mountains and Hawkesbury are both large regions in New South Wales, but they offer very different living environments. Blue Mountains is far more walkable, with a score of 5.5 (somewhat walkable) compared to 3.7 (mostly car-dependent) in Hawkesbury. This is seen in the ease of getting around on foot; for example, 92.4% of Blue Mountains homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, which is far higher than the 62.2% in Hawkesbury. Additionally, 46.6% of First Nations people in Blue Mountains completed Year 12, which is far higher than the 35.7% in Hawkesbury.
Both areas share very similar economic outcomes for First Nations residents, with typical personal incomes sitting around $700 and unemployment rates near 6%. This stability is mirrored in the way the two areas track against national figures, as both have First Nations populations that speak a First Nations language at rates well below the Australian average. While Blue Mountains has more Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who speak a traditional language, Hawkesbury has a well larger total First Nations population of 3,198 people.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Blue Mountains with nearby areas
Compare Hawkesbury with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blue Mountains vs Hawkesbury [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE107004/blue-mountains/vs/IARE107010/hawkesbury