Compare

Blue Mountains vs Hawkesbury

Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 51 km apart · Blue Mountains profile · Hawkesbury profile

Blue Mountains Hawkesbury

Blue Mountains and Hawkesbury are both large regions in New South Wales, but they offer very different living environments. Blue Mountains is far more walkable, with a score of 5.5 (somewhat walkable) compared to 3.7 (mostly car-dependent) in Hawkesbury. This is seen in the ease of getting around on foot; for example, 92.4% of Blue Mountains homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, which is far higher than the 62.2% in Hawkesbury. Additionally, 46.6% of First Nations people in Blue Mountains completed Year 12, which is far higher than the 35.7% in Hawkesbury.

Both areas share very similar economic outcomes for First Nations residents, with typical personal incomes sitting around $700 and unemployment rates near 6%. This stability is mirrored in the way the two areas track against national figures, as both have First Nations populations that speak a First Nations language at rates well below the Australian average. While Blue Mountains has more Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who speak a traditional language, Hawkesbury has a well larger total First Nations population of 3,198 people.

First Nations

First Nations people in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +1,101 larger in Hawkesbury
2,097 73rd pct 3,198 84th pct
Median age in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +1 yrs older in Blue Mountains
23 yrs 29th pct 22 yrs 14th pct
Year 12 in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +11.0 pts higher in Blue Mountains
46.6% 85th pct 35.7% 61st pct
Unemployment in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +0.2 pts higher in Hawkesbury
6.0% 5th pct 6.2% 6th pct
Median income in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +$32 higher in Blue Mountains
$718 87th pct $686 84th pct
Household income in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +$83 higher in Blue Mountains
$2,022 90th pct $1,939 88th pct
Indigenous language in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +3.8 pts higher in Blue Mountains
7.1% 54th pct 3.3% 21st pct

Walkability

Walk score in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +1.8 higher in Blue Mountains
5.5 76th pct 3.7 49th pct
Types ≤15 min in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +1.7 more in Blue Mountains
5.3 76th pct 3.6 39th pct
15-min city in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +23.5 pts higher in Blue Mountains
60.2% 71st pct 36.7% 34th pct
Walk to shops in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +24.0 pts higher in Blue Mountains
52.9% 57th pct 29.0% 21st pct
Walk to transit in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +19.0 pts higher in Blue Mountains
86.5% 77th pct 67.5% 63rd pct
Walk to school in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +11.9 pts higher in Blue Mountains
60.7% 54th pct 48.7% 36th pct
Walk to a park in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +30.2 pts higher in Blue Mountains
92.4% 72nd pct 62.2% 34th pct
Walk to health in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +21.3 pts higher in Blue Mountains
46.6% 62nd pct 25.3% 25th pct
Intersections/km² in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +11 higher in Blue Mountains
14 65th pct 2 52nd pct
Mean slope in Blue Mountainsin Hawkesbury +3.9 pts higher in Blue Mountains
10.8% 100th pct 6.9% 81st pct

Compare Blue Mountains with nearby areas

Compare Hawkesbury with nearby areas

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blue Mountains vs Hawkesbury [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE107004/blue-mountains/vs/IARE107010/hawkesbury