Compare
Hume vs Whitlam
Federal Electorate comparison ≈ 111 km apart · Hume profile · Whitlam profile
Hume Whitlam
Hume and Whitlam are two New South Wales areas with similar populations, but they differ sharply in layout. Whitlam is more walkable (somewhat walkable) than Hume (mostly car-dependent), with a far higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of public transport (88.1% vs 61.5%), schools (65.2% vs 45.6%) and parks (89.0% vs 69.7%). Hume has a higher share of detached houses (92.4% compared to 84.1% in Whitlam) and more households earning $3,000 or more a week (25.3% vs 19.5%).
Both areas sit near the national figure for the typical age of residents, with Hume at 38 and Whitlam at 41. They also share very similar levels of higher education, with about 16% of adults in both areas holding a bachelor degree or higher. While Whitlam has a higher share of older residents and people born overseas, these gaps have narrowed since 2011. At the same time, the age difference between the two has widened over the last decade.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 141,693
- First area, 2016: 150,643
- First area, 2021: 172,094
- Second area, 2011: 157,041
- Second area, 2016: 152,280
- Second area, 2021: 168,545
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Hume: 0.7% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Whitlam: 1.1% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Hume: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Whitlam: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Hume: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Whitlam: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Hume: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Whitlam: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Hume: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Whitlam: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Hume: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Hume: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 55–59 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Hume: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Hume: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Whitlam: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Hume: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Whitlam: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Hume: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Whitlam: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Hume: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Whitlam: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Hume: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Whitlam: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Hume: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Whitlam: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Hume: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Whitlam: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Hume: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Whitlam: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Hume: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Whitlam: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Hume: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 0–4 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $659
- First area, 2016: $714
- First area, 2021: $855
- Second area, 2011: $1,062
- Second area, 2016: $582
- Second area, 2021: $730
- First area, 2011: $1,647
- First area, 2016: $1,628
- First area, 2021: $1,966
- Second area, 2011: $1,964
- Second area, 2016: $1,303
- Second area, 2021: $1,603
- First area, 2011: $1,861
- First area, 2016: $1,901
- First area, 2021: $2,262
- Second area, 2011: $2,659
- Second area, 2016: $1,555
- Second area, 2021: $1,981
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $330
- First area, 2016: $325
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $496
- Second area, 2016: $330
- Second area, 2021: $410
- First area, 2011: $2,200
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $3,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,800
- Second area, 2021: $2,080
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Hume with nearby areas
Compare Whitlam with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Hume vs Whitlam [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ced/CED120/hume/vs/CED147/whitlam