Compare
Hughes vs Whitlam
Federal Electorate comparison ≈ 63 km apart · Hughes profile · Whitlam profile
Hughes Whitlam
Whitlam and Hughes are both populous New South Wales areas, but they differ sharply in education, income, and accessibility. Hughes has a far higher share of adults with a bachelor degree (28.0% compared to 16.6% in Whitlam) and a much higher typical household income, which is $2,393 a week compared to $1,603 in Whitlam. Residents in Hughes also enjoy much better local access to amenities, with 75.0% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while only 51.2% of homes in Whitlam share that convenience.
Since 2011, the two areas have tracked in opposite directions across several key measures. The gap in typical household income and the share of high-earners has flipped, with Hughes now seeing more growth in these areas. Similarly, the lead has flipped for those completing Year 12 and for one-parent families. Despite these shifts, they remain alike in some ways, including having similar unemployment rates and roughly the same share of recent overseas arrivals.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 154,738
- First area, 2016: 144,289
- First area, 2021: 150,300
- Second area, 2011: 157,041
- Second area, 2016: 152,280
- Second area, 2021: 168,545
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Hughes: 0.8% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Whitlam: 1.1% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Hughes: 0.9% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Whitlam: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Hughes: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Whitlam: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Hughes: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 70–74 in Whitlam: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Hughes: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Whitlam: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Hughes: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Hughes: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 55–59 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Hughes: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Hughes: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Whitlam: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Hughes: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Whitlam: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Hughes: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Whitlam: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Hughes: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Whitlam: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Hughes: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Whitlam: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Hughes: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Whitlam: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Hughes: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Whitlam: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Hughes: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Whitlam: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Hughes: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Whitlam: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Hughes: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $648
- First area, 2016: $828
- First area, 2021: $997
- Second area, 2011: $1,062
- Second area, 2016: $582
- Second area, 2021: $730
- First area, 2011: $1,593
- First area, 2016: $2,088
- First area, 2021: $2,393
- Second area, 2011: $1,964
- Second area, 2016: $1,303
- Second area, 2021: $1,603
- First area, 2011: $1,739
- First area, 2016: $2,300
- First area, 2021: $2,725
- Second area, 2011: $2,659
- Second area, 2016: $1,555
- Second area, 2021: $1,981
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $340
- First area, 2016: $445
- First area, 2021: $490
- Second area, 2011: $496
- Second area, 2016: $330
- Second area, 2021: $410
- First area, 2011: $2,200
- First area, 2016: $2,383
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $3,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,800
- Second area, 2021: $2,080
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Hughes with nearby areas
Compare Whitlam with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Hughes vs Whitlam [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ced/CED119/hughes/vs/CED147/whitlam