Compare
Gilmore vs Whitlam
Federal Electorate comparison ≈ 58 km apart · Gilmore profile · Whitlam profile
Gilmore Whitlam
Whitlam and Gilmore are both large New South Wales areas with similar populations, though they differ in age and accessibility. Gilmore is far older, with a typical resident aged 49 and 28.7% of people aged 65 or over, compared to 41 years and 21.2% in Whitlam. Whitlam is much more connected, with far more public transport departures (751.6 per 1,000 people versus 227.8 in Gilmore) and more homes within a 15-minute walk of a school (65.2% compared to 36.9%).
Both areas are very similar in their housing styles, with around 84% of homes being separate houses. This shared residential feel exists alongside a growing divide in age and tenure; since 2011, the gap in the number of seniors has widened and the proportion of homes owned outright has grown much faster in Gilmore. While both areas are well above the national figure for people needing help with daily activities, Whitlam has a higher share of households earning $3,000 or more per week.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 148,964
- First area, 2016: 150,436
- First area, 2021: 163,743
- Second area, 2011: 157,041
- Second area, 2016: 152,280
- Second area, 2021: 168,545
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 49 yrs
- First area, 2021: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gilmore: 1.3% males, 2.0% females; 85+ in Whitlam: 1.1% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Gilmore: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 80–84 in Whitlam: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 75–79 in Whitlam: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Gilmore: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 70–74 in Whitlam: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Gilmore: 4.1% males, 4.3% females; 65–69 in Whitlam: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Gilmore: 3.9% males, 4.4% females; 60–64 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Gilmore: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Gilmore: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Whitlam: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Gilmore: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Whitlam: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Gilmore: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Whitlam: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Gilmore: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Whitlam: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Gilmore: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Whitlam: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Gilmore: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Whitlam: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Gilmore: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Whitlam: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Gilmore: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Whitlam: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Gilmore: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Whitlam: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Gilmore: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Whitlam: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $375
- First area, 2016: $535
- First area, 2021: $655
- Second area, 2011: $1,062
- Second area, 2016: $582
- Second area, 2021: $730
- First area, 2011: $1,031
- First area, 2016: $1,038
- First area, 2021: $1,293
- Second area, 2011: $1,964
- Second area, 2016: $1,303
- Second area, 2021: $1,603
- First area, 2011: $1,078
- First area, 2016: $1,278
- First area, 2021: $1,601
- Second area, 2011: $2,659
- Second area, 2016: $1,555
- Second area, 2021: $1,981
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $260
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $496
- Second area, 2016: $330
- Second area, 2021: $410
- First area, 2011: $1,800
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $3,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,800
- Second area, 2021: $2,080
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Gilmore with nearby areas
Compare Whitlam with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gilmore vs Whitlam [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ced/CED116/gilmore/vs/CED147/whitlam