Compare
Bridgetown vs Nannup
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 33 km apart · Bridgetown profile · Nannup profile
Bridgetown Nannup
Bridgetown and Nannup (L) are nearby Western Australian towns with very different levels of walkability. Nannup (L) is very walkable, with 89.3% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 80.9% near health services. In contrast, Bridgetown is mostly car-dependent, with only 40.9% of homes close to groceries and 17.1% near health services. Bridgetown has a higher share of university-qualified adults (14.3%) and more households earning $3,000 or more a week (10.2% compared to 4.9% in Nannup (L)).
Both areas share a very similar housing mix, with around 92% of homes being separate houses. They also have a similar age profile, with people aged 65 and over making up about 31% to 32% of the population in both places. While Nannup (L) residents are noticeably older, the gap between the typical ages of the two towns has narrowed since 2011. Bridgetown has seen a larger influx of new residents, with 43.2% moving in during the last five years compared to 34.7% in Nannup (L).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,255
- First area, 2016: 1,448
- First area, 2021: 2,300
- Second area, 2011: 779
- Second area, 2016: 556
- Second area, 2021: 538
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 48 yrs
- First area, 2021: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 56 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bridgetown: 1.2% males, 2.0% females; 85+ in Nannup: 2.2% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Bridgetown: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Nannup: 2.1% males, 2.4% females
- 75–79 in Bridgetown: 2.4% males, 3.2% females; 75–79 in Nannup: 4.3% males, 4.5% females
- 70–74 in Bridgetown: 4.5% males, 3.8% females; 70–74 in Nannup: 3.7% males, 4.9% females
- 65–69 in Bridgetown: 4.0% males, 6.0% females; 65–69 in Nannup: 5.0% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Bridgetown: 3.5% males, 4.6% females; 60–64 in Nannup: 4.7% males, 5.8% females
- 55–59 in Bridgetown: 3.5% males, 4.6% females; 55–59 in Nannup: 3.2% males, 5.4% females
- 50–54 in Bridgetown: 2.6% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Nannup: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Bridgetown: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Nannup: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Bridgetown: 1.9% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Nannup: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 35–39 in Bridgetown: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 35–39 in Nannup: 0.9% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Bridgetown: 2.2% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Nannup: 1.5% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Bridgetown: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Nannup: 0.9% males, 0.7% females
- 20–24 in Bridgetown: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Nannup: 0.9% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Bridgetown: 2.1% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Nannup: 2.4% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Bridgetown: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Nannup: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Bridgetown: 2.2% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Nannup: 2.8% males, 1.1% females
- 0–4 in Bridgetown: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Nannup: 0.7% males, 2.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $575
- First area, 2016: $497
- First area, 2021: $565
- Second area, 2011: $836
- Second area, 2016: $717
- Second area, 2021: $610
- First area, 2011: $1,153
- First area, 2016: $845
- First area, 2021: $1,022
- Second area, 2011: $1,485
- Second area, 2016: $1,319
- Second area, 2021: $1,042
- First area, 2011: $1,268
- First area, 2016: $1,166
- First area, 2021: $1,397
- Second area, 2011: $1,816
- Second area, 2016: $1,536
- Second area, 2021: $1,343
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $292
- Second area, 2016: $150
- Second area, 2021: $256
- First area, 2011: $1,884
- First area, 2016: $1,378
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $800
- Second area, 2016: $800
- Second area, 2021: $1,159
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bridgetown with nearby areas
Compare Nannup with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bridgetown vs Nannup [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL515003/bridgetown/vs/UCL521035/nannup