Compare
Cedar Vale vs Logan Village
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 15 km apart · Cedar Vale profile · Logan Village profile
Cedar Vale Logan Village
Logan Village and Cedar Vale are nearby areas with similar populations, but they differ in how people live and move. Logan Village is a more convenient hub, rated as somewhat walkable, while Cedar Vale is car-dependent. In Logan Village, 57.5% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of the center, compared to 0% in Cedar Vale. There are also notable demographic gaps: Logan Village is older, with a typical resident aged 41, while Cedar Vale is younger at 34. This age difference is reflected in the senior population, which is far higher in Logan Village at 20.1% compared to 8.5% in Cedar Vale.
Both areas share very similar typical weekly incomes of around $2,200 to $2,300. They are also alike in the proportion of residents with a bachelor degree or higher, which sits around 10%. Over time, some of the differences between the two have shrunk. The gap in the typical age of residents has narrowed from 13 years in 2011 to 7 years today, and the difference in the share of people born overseas has also fallen.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,329
- First area, 2016: 1,269
- First area, 2021: 3,148
- Second area, 2011: 2,159
- Second area, 2016: 2,738
- Second area, 2021: 3,542
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 21 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cedar Vale: 0.2% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Logan Village: 0.5% males, 0.6% females
- 80–84 in Cedar Vale: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Logan Village: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Cedar Vale: 0.9% males, 0.7% females; 75–79 in Logan Village: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Cedar Vale: 0.9% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Logan Village: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 65–69 in Cedar Vale: 2.2% males, 1.6% females; 65–69 in Logan Village: 2.2% males, 3.4% females
- 60–64 in Cedar Vale: 2.2% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Logan Village: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Cedar Vale: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Logan Village: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Cedar Vale: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Logan Village: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Cedar Vale: 4.4% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Logan Village: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Cedar Vale: 4.0% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Logan Village: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Cedar Vale: 3.5% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Logan Village: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Cedar Vale: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Logan Village: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Cedar Vale: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in Logan Village: 1.7% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Cedar Vale: 3.0% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Logan Village: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Cedar Vale: 4.1% males, 4.0% females; 15–19 in Logan Village: 3.6% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Cedar Vale: 5.3% males, 4.6% females; 10–14 in Logan Village: 4.1% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Cedar Vale: 4.2% males, 4.6% females; 5–9 in Logan Village: 3.2% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Cedar Vale: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Logan Village: 3.2% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $669
- First area, 2016: $315
- First area, 2021: $892
- Second area, 2011: $497
- Second area, 2016: $748
- Second area, 2021: $762
- First area, 2011: $1,636
- First area, 2016: $775
- First area, 2021: $2,393
- Second area, 2011: $961
- Second area, 2016: $1,335
- Second area, 2021: $2,041
- First area, 2011: $1,633
- First area, 2016: $766
- First area, 2021: $2,331
- Second area, 2011: $1,181
- Second area, 2016: $1,669
- Second area, 2021: $2,205
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.3
- First area, 2016: 3.9
- First area, 2021: 3.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $100
- First area, 2021: $460
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $440
- First area, 2011: $2,123
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,352
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 1.20
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cedar Vale with nearby areas
Compare Logan Village with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cedar Vale vs Logan Village [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL315016/cedar-vale/vs/UCL315052/logan-village