Compare
Cedar Grove vs Logan Village
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 15 km apart · Cedar Grove profile · Logan Village profile
Cedar Grove Logan Village
Logan Village and Cedar Grove are nearby Queensland areas with very different levels of convenience. Logan Village is somewhat walkable, with 57.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school and 65.0% near groceries. In contrast, Cedar Grove is car-dependent, where no homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, health services, or schools. Logan Village has also seen more recent growth, with 49.2% of residents moving there in the last five years compared to 28.1% in Cedar Grove.
These two areas have tracked differently since 2011, though some gaps are now smaller. The difference in the typical age of residents has narrowed to just three years, and the gap in the share of homes owned outright has also decreased. They remain very similar in other ways, such as their typical weekly household incomes, which both sit around $2,050, and the share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,020
- First area, 2016: 3,077
- First area, 2021: 2,107
- Second area, 2011: 2,159
- Second area, 2016: 2,738
- Second area, 2021: 3,542
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cedar Grove: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Logan Village: 0.5% males, 0.6% females
- 80–84 in Cedar Grove: 0.5% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in Logan Village: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Cedar Grove: 1.4% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Logan Village: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Cedar Grove: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Logan Village: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 65–69 in Cedar Grove: 2.3% males, 2.0% females; 65–69 in Logan Village: 2.2% males, 3.4% females
- 60–64 in Cedar Grove: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Logan Village: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Cedar Grove: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Logan Village: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Cedar Grove: 4.6% males, 4.7% females; 50–54 in Logan Village: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Cedar Grove: 2.9% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Logan Village: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Cedar Grove: 3.3% males, 2.3% females; 40–44 in Logan Village: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Cedar Grove: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Logan Village: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Cedar Grove: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Logan Village: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Cedar Grove: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Logan Village: 1.7% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Cedar Grove: 2.7% males, 3.3% females; 20–24 in Logan Village: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Cedar Grove: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Logan Village: 3.6% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Cedar Grove: 3.5% males, 4.1% females; 10–14 in Logan Village: 4.1% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Cedar Grove: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 5–9 in Logan Village: 3.2% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Cedar Grove: 3.9% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Logan Village: 3.2% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $641
- First area, 2016: $695
- First area, 2021: $856
- Second area, 2011: $497
- Second area, 2016: $748
- Second area, 2021: $762
- First area, 2011: $1,503
- First area, 2016: $1,149
- First area, 2021: $2,053
- Second area, 2011: $961
- Second area, 2016: $1,335
- Second area, 2021: $2,041
- First area, 2011: $1,590
- First area, 2016: $1,546
- First area, 2021: $2,188
- Second area, 2011: $1,181
- Second area, 2016: $1,669
- Second area, 2021: $2,205
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $170
- First area, 2021: $430
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $440
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,000
- First area, 2021: $1,950
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,352
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cedar Grove with nearby areas
Compare Logan Village with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cedar Grove vs Logan Village [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL315015/cedar-grove/vs/UCL315052/logan-village