Compare
Kensington Grove - Regency Downs vs Lowood
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 14 km apart · Kensington Grove - Regency Downs profile · Lowood profile
Kensington Grove - Regency Downs Lowood
Kensington Grove - Regency Downs and Lowood are nearby Queensland areas with very different lifestyles. Kensington Grove - Regency Downs is more affluent, with a typical household income of $1,840 and 63.6% of adults working or looking for work. In contrast, Lowood is more car-dependent but much more walkable, with 75.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park compared to just 0.2% in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs. Lowood also has a much higher share of renters (36.8% versus 13.3%) and one-parent families (24.8% versus 13.6%).
Everyday life shares some similarities in both places, as they have nearly the same percentage of people born overseas and a similar lack of religious affiliation. However, the gaps between them are often widening. The income gap has grown significantly since 2011, and the difference in employment rates has also increased. While Lowood is mostly car-dependent, its walkability score is far higher than the car-dependent Kensington Grove - Regency Downs.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,294
- First area, 2016: 5,556
- First area, 2021: 5,512
- Second area, 2011: 3,706
- Second area, 2016: 2,681
- Second area, 2021: 3,873
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 59 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Lowood: 0.6% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Lowood: 1.2% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 1.4% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Lowood: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Lowood: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Lowood: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 60–64 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Lowood: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Lowood: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Lowood: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Lowood: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.1% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Lowood: 2.2% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Lowood: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Lowood: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Lowood: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.4% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Lowood: 3.2% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Lowood: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 10–14 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 5.0% males, 4.1% females; 10–14 in Lowood: 4.4% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 4.1% males, 3.7% females; 5–9 in Lowood: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 0–4 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 0–4 in Lowood: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $446
- First area, 2016: $738
- First area, 2021: $747
- Second area, 2011: $479
- Second area, 2016: $415
- Second area, 2021: $549
- First area, 2011: $828
- First area, 2016: $1,907
- First area, 2021: $1,840
- Second area, 2011: $1,037
- Second area, 2016: $706
- Second area, 2021: $1,154
- First area, 2011: $1,028
- First area, 2016: $1,864
- First area, 2021: $1,950
- Second area, 2011: $1,132
- Second area, 2016: $796
- Second area, 2021: $1,316
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 3.5
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 1.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $363
- Second area, 2016: $245
- Second area, 2021: $295
- First area, 2011: $1,424
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $1,800
- Second area, 2016: $888
- Second area, 2021: $1,292
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kensington Grove - Regency Downs with nearby areas
Compare Lowood with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kensington Grove - Regency Downs vs Lowood [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL314015/kensington-grove-regency-downs/vs/UCL315054/lowood