Compare
Kensington Grove - Regency Downs vs Laidley Heights
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 14 km apart · Kensington Grove - Regency Downs profile · Laidley Heights profile
Kensington Grove - Regency Downs Laidley Heights
Kensington Grove - Regency Downs and Laidley Heights (L) are nearby rural areas in the Lockyer Valley with very different demographics. Kensington Grove - Regency Downs is younger and more focused on families, with a typical age of 37 and 23.5% of people being children under 15. In contrast, Laidley Heights (L) is far older, with a typical age of 47 and a much higher share of seniors at 22.8%. This difference is reflected in housing, as 40.2% of homes in Laidley Heights (L) are owned outright, compared to 25.3% in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people who have recently arrived from overseas. They also share a very similar housing style, with nearly every home being a separate house, and both have similar rates of unemployment and people working from home. While they share these traits, the gap in typical weekly household income has widened since 2011, with Kensington Grove - Regency Downs now earning $434 more than Laidley Heights (L).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,294
- First area, 2016: 5,556
- First area, 2021: 5,512
- Second area, 2011: 1,372
- Second area, 2016: 526
- Second area, 2021: 1,272
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Laidley Heights: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Laidley Heights: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 1.4% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Laidley Heights: 3.5% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Laidley Heights: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Laidley Heights: 3.7% males, 3.9% females
- 60–64 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Laidley Heights: 4.0% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Laidley Heights: 4.4% males, 4.6% females
- 50–54 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Laidley Heights: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Laidley Heights: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.1% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Laidley Heights: 2.6% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Laidley Heights: 1.7% males, 2.5% females
- 30–34 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Laidley Heights: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Laidley Heights: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.4% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Laidley Heights: 1.9% males, 1.7% females
- 15–19 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Laidley Heights: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 5.0% males, 4.1% females; 10–14 in Laidley Heights: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 4.1% males, 3.7% females; 5–9 in Laidley Heights: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 0–4 in Laidley Heights: 1.7% males, 2.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $446
- First area, 2016: $738
- First area, 2021: $747
- Second area, 2011: $401
- Second area, 2016: $647
- Second area, 2021: $585
- First area, 2011: $828
- First area, 2016: $1,907
- First area, 2021: $1,840
- Second area, 2011: $781
- Second area, 2016: $1,125
- Second area, 2021: $1,406
- First area, 2011: $1,028
- First area, 2016: $1,864
- First area, 2021: $1,950
- Second area, 2011: $915
- Second area, 2016: $1,458
- Second area, 2021: $1,472
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 3.5
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 1.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $363
- Second area, 2016: $150
- Second area, 2021: $335
- First area, 2011: $1,424
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $1,560
- Second area, 2016: $1,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,311
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kensington Grove - Regency Downs with nearby areas
Compare Laidley Heights with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kensington Grove - Regency Downs vs Laidley Heights [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL314015/kensington-grove-regency-downs/vs/UCL321065/laidley-heights