Compare
Kensington Grove - Regency Downs vs Laidley
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 13 km apart · Kensington Grove - Regency Downs profile · Laidley profile
Kensington Grove - Regency Downs Laidley
Kensington Grove - Regency Downs and Laidley are nearby Queensland areas with very different lifestyles. Kensington Grove - Regency Downs has a younger feel and more wealth, with 23.5% of people under 15 and a typical household income of $1,840 a week. In contrast, Laidley is much older, with 26.8% of residents aged 65 and over, and a typical household income of $940. Laidley also has a much higher share of renters at 40.6% and more one-parent families at 30.0%.
Both areas share an almost identical proportion of people born overseas at 11.3%. This commonality exists alongside a growing divide in how the two places are built. Laidley is somewhat walkable, with many homes within a 15-minute walk of schools and parks. Kensington Grove - Regency Downs is car-dependent, where almost no one can walk to a park or health service. Since 2011, the gap in typical incomes and the number of older residents has widened significantly.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,294
- First area, 2016: 5,556
- First area, 2021: 5,512
- Second area, 2011: 1,598
- Second area, 2016: 3,797
- Second area, 2021: 3,976
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Laidley: 1.6% males, 2.9% females
- 80–84 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Laidley: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 1.4% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Laidley: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 70–74 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Laidley: 3.1% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Laidley: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Laidley: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Laidley: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Laidley: 2.5% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Laidley: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.1% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Laidley: 2.1% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Laidley: 2.2% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Laidley: 2.0% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Laidley: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 2.4% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Laidley: 2.6% males, 3.5% females
- 15–19 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Laidley: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 5.0% males, 4.1% females; 10–14 in Laidley: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 4.1% males, 3.7% females; 5–9 in Laidley: 3.5% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Kensington Grove - Regency Downs: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 0–4 in Laidley: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $446
- First area, 2016: $738
- First area, 2021: $747
- Second area, 2011: $580
- Second area, 2016: $552
- Second area, 2021: $497
- First area, 2011: $828
- First area, 2016: $1,907
- First area, 2021: $1,840
- Second area, 2011: $1,233
- Second area, 2016: $1,217
- Second area, 2021: $940
- First area, 2011: $1,028
- First area, 2016: $1,864
- First area, 2021: $1,950
- Second area, 2011: $1,361
- Second area, 2016: $1,368
- Second area, 2021: $1,189
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 3.5
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $363
- Second area, 2016: $330
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,424
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $1,474
- Second area, 2016: $1,650
- Second area, 2021: $1,083
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kensington Grove - Regency Downs with nearby areas
Compare Laidley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kensington Grove - Regency Downs vs Laidley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL314015/kensington-grove-regency-downs/vs/UCL315050/laidley