Compare
Paynesville vs Marlo
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 74 km apart · Paynesville profile · Marlo profile
Paynesville Marlo
Paynesville and Marlo (L) are both located in East Gippsland, but they differ in age and wealth. Paynesville is a much older area, where the typical resident is 64 and 48.2% of people are seniors. It also has a higher rate of long-term health conditions at 47.0%. In contrast, Marlo (L) has a higher typical household income of $1,397 per week compared to $975 in Paynesville. Marlo (L) is also more walkable, with 71.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while only 45.9% of homes in Paynesville have the same access.
The gap in typical incomes between the two areas has widened since 2011, but they still share some common traits. Both are considered somewhat walkable and have very similar household sizes, with about two people per home. They also have almost identical rates of people who speak little or no English and similar unemployment rates. While both areas have populations far older than the national figure, they each offer a different mix of amenities and housing types.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,134
- First area, 2016: 2,919
- First area, 2021: 3,505
- Second area, 2011: 390
- Second area, 2016: 271
- Second area, 2021: 491
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 64 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 56 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Paynesville: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 85+ in Marlo: 0.8% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Paynesville: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 80–84 in Marlo: 0.6% males, 2.1% females
- 75–79 in Paynesville: 5.1% males, 4.9% females; 75–79 in Marlo: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 70–74 in Paynesville: 7.1% males, 6.7% females; 70–74 in Marlo: 6.4% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Paynesville: 5.4% males, 6.6% females; 65–69 in Marlo: 6.4% males, 5.0% females
- 60–64 in Paynesville: 4.5% males, 5.0% females; 60–64 in Marlo: 6.8% males, 4.8% females
- 55–59 in Paynesville: 3.1% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Marlo: 4.8% males, 5.2% females
- 50–54 in Paynesville: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Marlo: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Paynesville: 1.9% males, 2.4% females; 45–49 in Marlo: 2.3% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 40–44 in Marlo: 1.4% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Paynesville: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 35–39 in Marlo: 1.9% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Paynesville: 1.0% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Marlo: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Paynesville: 1.6% males, 1.3% females; 25–29 in Marlo: 0.8% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Paynesville: 1.2% males, 1.3% females; 20–24 in Marlo: 1.4% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Marlo: 3.9% males, 1.0% females
- 10–14 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 10–14 in Marlo: 1.0% males, 2.3% females
- 5–9 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 5–9 in Marlo: 1.7% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Paynesville: 1.0% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Marlo: 1.9% males, 1.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $386
- First area, 2016: $486
- First area, 2021: $554
- Second area, 2011: $468
- Second area, 2016: $658
- Second area, 2021: $725
- First area, 2011: $773
- First area, 2016: $861
- First area, 2021: $975
- Second area, 2011: $919
- Second area, 2016: $1,527
- Second area, 2021: $1,397
- First area, 2011: $921
- First area, 2016: $1,141
- First area, 2021: $1,276
- Second area, 2011: $1,044
- Second area, 2016: $1,613
- Second area, 2021: $1,704
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2016: $370
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,055
- First area, 2016: $997
- First area, 2021: $1,202
- Second area, 2011: $1,192
- Second area, 2016: $1,408
- Second area, 2021: $1,511
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Paynesville with nearby areas
Compare Marlo with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Paynesville vs Marlo [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL215068/paynesville/vs/UCL222050/marlo