Compare
Paynesville vs Bruthen
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 25 km apart · Paynesville profile · Bruthen profile
Paynesville Bruthen
Paynesville and Bruthen (L) are two distinct nearby areas in East Gippsland. Paynesville is much older, with a typical resident aged 64 and 48.2% of the population aged 65 or over. This is far higher than Bruthen (L), where the typical age is 41 and only 15.0% are seniors. These differences are reflected in the home ownership and health data; Paynesville has far more homes owned outright (58.6%) and a much higher share of people with long-term health conditions (47.0%). In contrast, Bruthen (L) has many more children (19.2%) and far more adults working or looking for work (60.3%).
Everyday life shares some similarities, as both areas are somewhat walkable and have almost the same share of residents with a bachelor degree or higher. They also have similar rates of people using another language at home. While the two areas are now quite different, some gaps have shifted over time. The difference in the number of people born overseas has narrowed, and the gap in the share of people who identify as having no religion has also shrunk since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,134
- First area, 2016: 2,919
- First area, 2021: 3,505
- Second area, 2011: 537
- Second area, 2016: 587
- Second area, 2021: 574
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 64 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Paynesville: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 85+ in Bruthen: 0.5% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Paynesville: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 80–84 in Bruthen: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Paynesville: 5.1% males, 4.9% females; 75–79 in Bruthen: 1.7% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Paynesville: 7.1% males, 6.7% females; 70–74 in Bruthen: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 65–69 in Paynesville: 5.4% males, 6.6% females; 65–69 in Bruthen: 1.9% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Paynesville: 4.5% males, 5.0% females; 60–64 in Bruthen: 3.4% males, 4.6% females
- 55–59 in Paynesville: 3.1% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Bruthen: 4.7% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Paynesville: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Bruthen: 2.7% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Paynesville: 1.9% males, 2.4% females; 45–49 in Bruthen: 2.5% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 40–44 in Bruthen: 2.9% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Paynesville: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 35–39 in Bruthen: 3.4% males, 2.0% females
- 30–34 in Paynesville: 1.0% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Bruthen: 2.7% males, 4.1% females
- 25–29 in Paynesville: 1.6% males, 1.3% females; 25–29 in Bruthen: 3.9% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Paynesville: 1.2% males, 1.3% females; 20–24 in Bruthen: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
- 15–19 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Bruthen: 4.1% males, 1.5% females
- 10–14 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 10–14 in Bruthen: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 5–9 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 5–9 in Bruthen: 4.4% males, 4.1% females
- 0–4 in Paynesville: 1.0% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Bruthen: 4.1% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $386
- First area, 2016: $486
- First area, 2021: $554
- Second area, 2011: $420
- Second area, 2016: $568
- Second area, 2021: $647
- First area, 2011: $773
- First area, 2016: $861
- First area, 2021: $975
- Second area, 2011: $869
- Second area, 2016: $1,065
- Second area, 2021: $1,180
- First area, 2011: $921
- First area, 2016: $1,141
- First area, 2021: $1,276
- Second area, 2011: $1,069
- Second area, 2016: $1,294
- Second area, 2021: $1,521
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2016: $245
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,055
- First area, 2016: $997
- First area, 2021: $1,202
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,092
- Second area, 2021: $1,040
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Paynesville with nearby areas
Compare Bruthen with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Paynesville vs Bruthen [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL215068/paynesville/vs/UCL221010/bruthen