Compare
Greta vs Louth Park
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 19 km apart · Greta profile · Louth Park profile
Greta Louth Park
Greta and Louth Park (L) are nearby New South Wales areas with very different profiles. Louth Park (L) is a high-earning area where the typical household income is $3,429 a week and 24.1% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher. In contrast, Greta is more accessible for pedestrians, with a somewhat walkable score of 4.3, whereas Louth Park (L) is car-dependent. Greta also has a much higher share of people in de facto relationships (17.4% compared to 7.1%) and a larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population (9.3% versus 3.0%).
Since 2011, the two areas have drifted further apart across several key measures. The gap in typical household income has grown significantly, and Louth Park (L) has seen its lead in university qualifications and Year 12 completion widen. Despite these diverging trends, they remain similar in other ways; both have about the same share of children under 15 (around 23%) and an almost identical proportion of residents born overseas.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,198
- First area, 2016: 1,601
- First area, 2021: 3,230
- Second area, 2011: 650
- Second area, 2016: 685
- Second area, 2021: 767
- First area, 2011: 55 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Greta: 0.4% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Louth Park: 0.0% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Greta: 0.5% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in Louth Park: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Greta: 1.4% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Louth Park: 0.5% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Greta: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 70–74 in Louth Park: 0.7% males, 1.2% females
- 65–69 in Greta: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Louth Park: 3.2% males, 1.7% females
- 60–64 in Greta: 2.8% males, 2.1% females; 60–64 in Louth Park: 3.0% males, 1.4% females
- 55–59 in Greta: 2.2% males, 2.3% females; 55–59 in Louth Park: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Greta: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Louth Park: 4.9% males, 4.3% females
- 45–49 in Greta: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Louth Park: 5.0% males, 5.7% females
- 40–44 in Greta: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Louth Park: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Greta: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Louth Park: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 30–34 in Greta: 4.0% males, 4.2% females; 30–34 in Louth Park: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Greta: 3.9% males, 4.5% females; 25–29 in Louth Park: 1.8% males, 0.9% females
- 20–24 in Greta: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Louth Park: 3.6% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Greta: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Louth Park: 5.3% males, 3.9% females
- 10–14 in Greta: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Louth Park: 6.7% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Greta: 3.9% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Louth Park: 4.2% males, 4.5% females
- 0–4 in Greta: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 0–4 in Louth Park: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $384
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $807
- Second area, 2011: $378
- Second area, 2016: $558
- Second area, 2021: $1,111
- First area, 2011: $735
- First area, 2016: $1,122
- First area, 2021: $1,930
- Second area, 2011: $664
- Second area, 2016: $1,068
- Second area, 2021: $3,429
- First area, 2011: $900
- First area, 2016: $1,184
- First area, 2021: $2,208
- Second area, 2011: $772
- Second area, 2016: $1,307
- Second area, 2021: $3,416
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.1
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 3.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $380
- First area, 2021: $360
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $553
- First area, 2011: $1,600
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,742
- Second area, 2011: $847
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Greta with nearby areas
Compare Louth Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Greta vs Louth Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL115070/greta/vs/UCL121069/louth-park