Compare
Port Lincoln vs Bunbury
Urban Area comparison ≈ 1,861 km apart · Port Lincoln profile · Bunbury profile
Port Lincoln Bunbury
Bunbury and Port Lincoln are both regional hubs, but they differ significantly in size and layout. Bunbury is a larger center where people are more likely to be born overseas (20.0% compared to 8.5% in Port Lincoln) and more likely to earn high incomes, with 12.5% of people earning $2,000 or more a week. Bunbury is also much more walkable, described as somewhat walkable, whereas Port Lincoln is mostly car-dependent. This is seen in the gap for access to groceries, which are within a 15-minute walk for 55.4% of Bunbury homes but only 25.2% in Port Lincoln.
Since 2011, the two areas have tracked differently, with some gaps widening and others closing. While the difference in high-earning households has grown, the gap in typical weekly rents has narrowed to $80. Despite these shifts, the two areas remain very similar in some ways. They share a similar typical weekly income of around $730 to $770 and have almost the same proportion of children under 15, which sits below the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 15,221
- First area, 2016: 15,685
- First area, 2021: 16,307
- Second area, 2011: 65,608
- Second area, 2016: 72,402
- Second area, 2021: 76,452
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Port Lincoln: 1.0% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Bunbury: 0.8% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Port Lincoln: 1.1% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Bunbury: 0.9% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Port Lincoln: 2.0% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Bunbury: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Port Lincoln: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Bunbury: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 65–69 in Port Lincoln: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Bunbury: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 60–64 in Bunbury: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Bunbury: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Bunbury: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Port Lincoln: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Bunbury: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Port Lincoln: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Bunbury: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Bunbury: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Bunbury: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Port Lincoln: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Bunbury: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Port Lincoln: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Bunbury: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Bunbury: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Bunbury: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Bunbury: 3.6% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Port Lincoln: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Bunbury: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $529
- First area, 2016: $615
- First area, 2021: $736
- Second area, 2011: $623
- Second area, 2016: $668
- Second area, 2021: $770
- First area, 2011: $951
- First area, 2016: $1,125
- First area, 2021: $1,301
- Second area, 2011: $1,387
- Second area, 2016: $1,436
- Second area, 2021: $1,605
- First area, 2011: $1,236
- First area, 2016: $1,434
- First area, 2021: $1,750
- Second area, 2011: $1,664
- Second area, 2016: $1,732
- Second area, 2021: $2,009
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $220
- First area, 2021: $240
- Second area, 2016: $312
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2011: $1,343
- First area, 2016: $1,317
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,829
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $1,625
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Port Lincoln with nearby areas
Compare Bunbury with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Port Lincoln vs Bunbury [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/4005/port-lincoln/vs/5003/bunbury