Compare
Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Port Lincoln
Urban Area comparison ≈ 584 km apart · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile · Port Lincoln profile
Not in any Significant Urban Area Port Lincoln
Not in any Significant Urban Area (SA) and Port Lincoln are two distinct South Australian regions with different living patterns. Not in any Significant Urban Area (SA) is much more likely to have homes owned outright (42.2% compared to 31.7% in Port Lincoln) and a higher share of separate houses at 93.6%. Port Lincoln is more walkable, with 64% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport compared to only 27.5% in Not in any Significant Urban Area (SA).
Since 2011, the gap in typical age has widened, with residents in Not in any Significant Urban Area (SA) now noticeably older at 47. Both areas share a similar typical weekly household income of around $1,300 and an identical unemployment rate of 4.3%. While Not in any Significant Urban Area (SA) has a higher share of people working from home, both regions remain mostly car-dependent.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 264,881
- First area, 2016: 262,512
- First area, 2021: 272,390
- Second area, 2011: 15,221
- Second area, 2016: 15,685
- Second area, 2021: 16,307
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.0% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Port Lincoln: 1.0% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Port Lincoln: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Port Lincoln: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Port Lincoln: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Port Lincoln: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 60–64 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Port Lincoln: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Port Lincoln: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Port Lincoln: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Port Lincoln: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Port Lincoln: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $489
- First area, 2016: $568
- First area, 2021: $664
- Second area, 2011: $529
- Second area, 2016: $615
- Second area, 2021: $736
- First area, 2011: $925
- First area, 2016: $1,089
- First area, 2021: $1,259
- Second area, 2011: $951
- Second area, 2016: $1,125
- Second area, 2021: $1,301
- First area, 2011: $1,153
- First area, 2016: $1,361
- First area, 2021: $1,606
- Second area, 2011: $1,236
- Second area, 2016: $1,434
- Second area, 2021: $1,750
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $180
- First area, 2021: $220
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $1,192
- First area, 2016: $1,192
- First area, 2021: $1,200
- Second area, 2011: $1,343
- Second area, 2016: $1,317
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Compare Port Lincoln with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Port Lincoln [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/4000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area/vs/4005/port-lincoln