Compare
Mount Isa vs Not in any Significant Urban Area
Urban Area comparison ≈ 3,791 km apart · Mount Isa profile · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile
Mount Isa Not in any Significant Urban Area
Mount Isa and Not in any Significant Urban Area (OT) are far apart and very different. Mount Isa has a much younger population, with a typical age of 31 compared to 43 in Not in any Significant Urban Area (OT). The two areas differ sharply in their makeup; Mount Isa has a far higher Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population (21.4% versus 4.7%) and more people with no religion (40.9% versus 27.2%). Higher incomes are also common in Mount Isa, where the typical household earns $2,236 a week, which is well higher than the $1,497 seen in Not in any Significant Urban Area (OT).
Both areas are mostly car-dependent when it comes to getting around. They also share a similar proportion of people who need help with daily activities, both sitting around 3% to 4%. While they are alike in some ways, other gaps are shifting. The age difference has grown since 2011, and the gap in home ownership has flipped, with homes now far more likely to be owned outright in Not in any Significant Urban Area (OT).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 73,681
- First area, 2016: 76,985
- First area, 2021: 18,317
- Second area, 2011: 3,029
- Second area, 2016: 4,587
- Second area, 2021: 4,788
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Isa: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.6% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Mount Isa: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.0% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Mount Isa: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Mount Isa: 1.2% males, 1.0% females; 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.3% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Mount Isa: 1.4% males, 1.3% females; 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Mount Isa: 2.4% males, 1.9% females; 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Mount Isa: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Mount Isa: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Mount Isa: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Mount Isa: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Mount Isa: 3.9% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Mount Isa: 4.2% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Mount Isa: 4.6% males, 4.7% females; 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Mount Isa: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Mount Isa: 3.5% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.8% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Mount Isa: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Mount Isa: 4.1% males, 3.9% females; 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Mount Isa: 4.6% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $603
- First area, 2016: $643
- First area, 2021: $1,158
- Second area, 2011: $830
- Second area, 2016: $712
- Second area, 2021: $829
- First area, 2011: $1,219
- First area, 2016: $1,310
- First area, 2021: $2,236
- Second area, 2011: $1,671
- Second area, 2016: $1,377
- Second area, 2021: $1,497
- First area, 2011: $1,491
- First area, 2016: $1,599
- First area, 2021: $2,652
- Second area, 2011: $1,731
- Second area, 2016: $1,568
- Second area, 2021: $1,890
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $270
- First area, 2021: $275
- Second area, 2016: $140
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $1,647
- First area, 2016: $1,560
- First area, 2021: $1,546
- Second area, 2011: $805
- Second area, 2016: $1,400
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Isa with nearby areas
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Isa vs Not in any Significant Urban Area [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/3013/mount-isa/vs/9000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area