Compare
Griffith vs Not in any Significant Urban Area
Urban Area comparison ≈ 298 km apart · Griffith profile · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile
Griffith Not in any Significant Urban Area
Griffith and Not in any Significant Urban Area (ACT) are very different places despite being in the same region. Griffith is a more diverse and walkable hub, where 26.5% of people were born overseas and 27.3% use another language at home. In contrast, Not in any Significant Urban Area (ACT) is more car-dependent and has a higher share of university graduates (27.0% compared to 14.8% in Griffith). There is also a large gap in wealth; the typical weekly household income in Not in any Significant Urban Area (ACT) is $2,899, which is $1,200 far higher than the $1,699 typical income in Griffith.
Both areas share similar patterns in daily home life, such as the proportion of people doing at least 15 hours of unpaid housework and those caring for children. While they are alike in these domestic routines, other gaps are widening. The difference in typical incomes and the share of people without a religion have both grown since 2011, while the gap in higher education levels has narrowed.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 17,900
- First area, 2016: 14,754
- First area, 2021: 20,569
- Second area, 2011: 1,622
- Second area, 2016: 1,538
- Second area, 2021: 1,666
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Griffith: 1.0% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.3% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Griffith: 1.2% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Griffith: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.5% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Griffith: 1.7% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.2% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Griffith: 2.2% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.6% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Griffith: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.6% males, 3.9% females
- 55–59 in Griffith: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Griffith: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.2% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Griffith: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Griffith: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.7% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Griffith: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Griffith: 4.1% males, 4.2% females; 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Griffith: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.2% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Griffith: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 4.2% females
- 15–19 in Griffith: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 4.1% females
- 10–14 in Griffith: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Griffith: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 0–4 in Griffith: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.1% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $527
- First area, 2016: $472
- First area, 2021: $833
- Second area, 2011: $753
- Second area, 2016: $767
- Second area, 2021: $987
- First area, 2011: $1,028
- First area, 2016: $889
- First area, 2021: $1,699
- Second area, 2011: $1,848
- Second area, 2016: $2,457
- Second area, 2021: $2,899
- First area, 2011: $1,255
- First area, 2016: $1,097
- First area, 2021: $1,974
- Second area, 2011: $2,224
- Second area, 2016: $2,766
- Second area, 2021: $3,077
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2016: $260
- Second area, 2021: $380
- First area, 2011: $1,582
- First area, 2016: $1,235
- First area, 2021: $1,500
- Second area, 2011: $2,492
- Second area, 2016: $2,412
- Second area, 2021: $2,312
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Griffith with nearby areas
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Griffith vs Not in any Significant Urban Area [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/1016/griffith/vs/8000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area