Compare
Batemans Bay vs Not in any Significant Urban Area
Urban Area comparison ≈ 115 km apart · Batemans Bay profile · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile
Batemans Bay Not in any Significant Urban Area
Batemans Bay and Not in any Significant Urban Area (ACT) are very different places. Batemans Bay is much older, with a typical resident aged 53 and 32.2% of people aged 65 and over. It is a somewhat walkable area where 45.4% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed. In contrast, Not in any Significant Urban Area (ACT) is car-dependent, with a typical resident aged 38. It is much wealthier, with a typical household income of $2,899 a week, compared to $1,170 in Batemans Bay. Education levels are also far higher in the ACT area, where 27.0% of adults have a bachelor degree or higher.
Both areas sit close to the national figure for the share of people with no religion. Beyond this, they share similar rates of people who speak little or no English and those providing unpaid care. However, the gaps between them are often widening. The difference in typical household income has grown since 2011, and the gap in the share of people living alone has also increased, with Batemans Bay now far higher at 31.4%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 15,733
- First area, 2016: 16,044
- First area, 2021: 17,524
- Second area, 2011: 1,622
- Second area, 2016: 1,538
- Second area, 2021: 1,666
- First area, 2011: 49 yrs
- First area, 2016: 53 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Batemans Bay: 1.4% males, 2.3% females; 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.3% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Batemans Bay: 1.9% males, 2.1% females; 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Batemans Bay: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.5% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Batemans Bay: 4.7% males, 4.6% females; 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.2% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Batemans Bay: 4.3% males, 4.6% females; 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.6% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Batemans Bay: 4.1% males, 4.7% females; 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.6% males, 3.9% females
- 55–59 in Batemans Bay: 3.1% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Batemans Bay: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.2% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Batemans Bay: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Batemans Bay: 2.1% males, 2.4% females; 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.7% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Batemans Bay: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Batemans Bay: 1.9% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Batemans Bay: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.2% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Batemans Bay: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 4.2% females
- 15–19 in Batemans Bay: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 4.1% females
- 10–14 in Batemans Bay: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Batemans Bay: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 0–4 in Batemans Bay: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.1% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $431
- First area, 2016: $512
- First area, 2021: $617
- Second area, 2011: $753
- Second area, 2016: $767
- Second area, 2021: $987
- First area, 2011: $789
- First area, 2016: $955
- First area, 2021: $1,170
- Second area, 2011: $1,848
- Second area, 2016: $2,457
- Second area, 2021: $2,899
- First area, 2011: $933
- First area, 2016: $1,171
- First area, 2021: $1,410
- Second area, 2011: $2,224
- Second area, 2016: $2,766
- Second area, 2021: $3,077
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $275
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2016: $260
- Second area, 2021: $380
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,500
- First area, 2021: $1,560
- Second area, 2011: $2,492
- Second area, 2016: $2,412
- Second area, 2021: $2,312
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Batemans Bay with nearby areas
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Batemans Bay vs Not in any Significant Urban Area [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/1004/batemans-bay/vs/8000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area