Compare
Rural Balance vs Bounded Locality
Section of State comparison ≈ 1,173 km apart · Rural Balance profile · Bounded Locality profile
Rural Balance Bounded Locality
Rural Balance and Bounded Locality are far apart and offer very different lifestyles. Bounded Locality is much more walkable, with 60% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 58% near a school. In contrast, Rural Balance is car-dependent, with only 3.7% of homes near groceries. There are also notable gaps in living arrangements and income; Bounded Locality has far more people living alone (32.4% compared to 19.8%) and a lower typical weekly household income of $1,144, while Rural Balance sees $1,557.
Daily life is similar in both places when it comes to unpaid work and travel, with about a quarter of adults caring for children and both areas seeing almost no commuting by public transport. Over time, the gaps between them have generally widened. This is seen in the typical age of residents, where Bounded Locality is now 3 years older than Rural Balance, up from a 2-year gap in 2011. The divide in working habits has also grown, with Rural Balance now far more likely to have people working from home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 411,210
- First area, 2016: 430,761
- First area, 2021: 448,574
- Second area, 2011: 50,459
- Second area, 2016: 53,667
- Second area, 2021: 51,089
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 49 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.6% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Bounded Locality: 1.3% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Rural Balance: 1.1% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 1.5% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Rural Balance: 2.1% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Rural Balance: 3.2% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 3.9% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Rural Balance: 3.8% males, 3.3% females; 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 3.9% females
- 60–64 in Rural Balance: 4.3% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 4.3% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Rural Balance: 4.2% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 3.7% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Rural Balance: 4.0% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Rural Balance: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Rural Balance: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Rural Balance: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 30–34 in Rural Balance: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Rural Balance: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 2.2% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Rural Balance: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Rural Balance: 3.6% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Rural Balance: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $518
- First area, 2016: $597
- First area, 2021: $707
- Second area, 2011: $452
- Second area, 2016: $527
- Second area, 2021: $613
- First area, 2011: $1,102
- First area, 2016: $1,305
- First area, 2021: $1,557
- Second area, 2011: $863
- Second area, 2016: $1,018
- Second area, 2021: $1,144
- First area, 2011: $1,281
- First area, 2016: $1,490
- First area, 2021: $1,839
- Second area, 2011: $1,084
- Second area, 2016: $1,292
- Second area, 2021: $1,477
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $220
- First area, 2021: $277
- Second area, 2016: $175
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $1,600
- First area, 2016: $1,677
- First area, 2021: $1,712
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,100
- Second area, 2021: $1,100
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rural Balance vs Bounded Locality [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS33/rural-balance/vs/SOS42/bounded-locality