Compare
Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance
Section of State comparison ≈ 1,305 km apart · Bounded Locality profile · Rural Balance profile
Bounded Locality Rural Balance
Rural Balance and Bounded Locality are two very different environments. Bounded Locality is much more walkable, with a score of 4.0 (somewhat walkable) compared to 0.5 (car-dependent) in Rural Balance. This is reflected in the daily reach of residents; for example, 78.9% of homes in Bounded Locality are within a 15-minute walk of a park, while only 16.1% are in Rural Balance. Access to other services is also far higher in Bounded Locality, where 57.6% of homes are near public transport and 45.6% are near groceries, compared to just 2.1% and 3.7% respectively in Rural Balance.
Both areas sit near the national figure for people with long-term health conditions, though this is well higher in Bounded Locality at 33.5%. They are also very similar in other ways, such as having a similar share of children under 15 (around 17%) and nearly identical rates of unpaid childcare (24.7%). While some gaps have remained steady since 2011, others are shifting; the difference in the share of households earning $3,000 or more a week has widened, with Rural Balance now well higher at 18.2%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 152,095
- First area, 2016: 148,561
- First area, 2021: 148,805
- Second area, 2011: 411,210
- Second area, 2016: 430,761
- Second area, 2021: 448,574
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bounded Locality: 0.9% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.6% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 1.3% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Rural Balance: 1.1% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Rural Balance: 2.1% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Rural Balance: 3.2% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 65–69 in Rural Balance: 3.8% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Rural Balance: 4.3% males, 3.9% females
- 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Rural Balance: 4.2% males, 4.1% females
- 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Rural Balance: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Rural Balance: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Rural Balance: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Rural Balance: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Rural Balance: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
- 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 25–29 in Rural Balance: 2.3% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Rural Balance: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Rural Balance: 3.6% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Rural Balance: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $467
- First area, 2016: $550
- First area, 2021: $676
- Second area, 2011: $518
- Second area, 2016: $597
- Second area, 2021: $707
- First area, 2011: $930
- First area, 2016: $1,117
- First area, 2021: $1,359
- Second area, 2011: $1,102
- Second area, 2016: $1,305
- Second area, 2021: $1,557
- First area, 2011: $1,145
- First area, 2016: $1,368
- First area, 2021: $1,714
- Second area, 2011: $1,281
- Second area, 2016: $1,490
- Second area, 2021: $1,839
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $231
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $277
- First area, 2011: $1,430
- First area, 2016: $1,441
- First area, 2021: $1,563
- Second area, 2011: $1,600
- Second area, 2016: $1,677
- Second area, 2021: $1,712
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS12/bounded-locality/vs/SOS33/rural-balance