Compare
Bundaberg vs Rockhampton
State Electorate comparison ≈ 250 km apart · Bundaberg profile · Rockhampton profile
Bundaberg Rockhampton
Rockhampton and Bundaberg are two Queensland centres with distinct profiles. Bundaberg is an older area, where the typical resident is 42 and 24.4% are seniors, compared to a typical age of 36 and 16.6% seniors in Rockhampton. Public transport is far more available in Bundaberg, where 83.1% of homes are within a 10-minute walk of a stop, while Rockhampton has no recorded public transport stops. In contrast, Rockhampton has better access to health services and schools by foot, and typical weekly household income is well higher at $1,411 compared to $1,123 in Bundaberg.
Both areas sit around the national figure for the share of people who are 65 and over. They are also very similar in the number of people per home and the share of households that rent. Since 2011, the age gap between the two has narrowed, and the difference in school completion rates has also fallen, with Rockhampton's share now 6.1 percentage points higher than Bundaberg's.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 42,084
- First area, 2016: 49,957
- First area, 2021: 50,553
- Second area, 2011: 48,915
- Second area, 2016: 55,671
- Second area, 2021: 53,919
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundaberg: 1.4% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Rockhampton: 0.9% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Bundaberg: 1.6% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Rockhampton: 0.9% males, 1.5% females
- 75–79 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 75–79 in Rockhampton: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Rockhampton: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Rockhampton: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Rockhampton: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Rockhampton: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Rockhampton: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Rockhampton: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Rockhampton: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Rockhampton: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Rockhampton: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Bundaberg: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Rockhampton: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Rockhampton: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 15–19 in Bundaberg: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Rockhampton: 3.6% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Rockhampton: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Rockhampton: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Rockhampton: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $558
- First area, 2016: $665
- First area, 2021: $603
- Second area, 2011: $727
- Second area, 2016: $806
- Second area, 2021: $740
- First area, 2011: $1,193
- First area, 2016: $1,449
- First area, 2021: $1,123
- Second area, 2011: $1,432
- Second area, 2016: $1,674
- Second area, 2021: $1,411
- First area, 2011: $1,407
- First area, 2016: $1,701
- First area, 2021: $1,431
- Second area, 2011: $1,897
- Second area, 2016: $2,169
- Second area, 2021: $1,805
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $410
- First area, 2021: $280
- Second area, 2011: $350
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $280
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,250
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundaberg with nearby areas
Compare Rockhampton with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundaberg vs Rockhampton [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30009/bundaberg/vs/SED30073/rockhampton