Compare
Acacia Hills vs Noonamah
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Acacia Hills profile · Noonamah profile
Acacia Hills Noonamah
Acacia Hills (NT) and Noonamah are two nearby Northern Territory areas with distinct profiles. Acacia Hills (NT) is a wealthier, younger hub where 29.6% of households earn $3,000 or more a week and 27.2% of residents arrived recently from overseas. It is also more family-oriented, with 20.0% of the population being children under 15 and far more people caring for children unpaid. In contrast, Noonamah has a much older First Nations population, with a typical age of 36 compared to 20 in Acacia Hills (NT). Noonamah is also more reliant on public transport, with 27.44 stops per 1,000 people and a few walkable amenities, while Acacia Hills (NT) has none.
Everyday life in both places shares many similarities, such as the typical monthly home-loan payment of around $2,170 and similar rates of volunteering. Both areas also have very few people who commute by public transport and almost no homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, health services or schools. While Acacia Hills (NT) currently has higher typical incomes and more full-time employment, both areas remain well above the national figure for their share of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 638
- First area, 2016: 694
- First area, 2021: 711
- Second area, 2011: 528
- Second area, 2016: 319
- Second area, 2021: 328
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Acacia Hills: 0.0% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Noonamah: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Acacia Hills: 0.0% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in Noonamah: 0.0% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Acacia Hills: 0.6% males, 0.4% females; 75–79 in Noonamah: 0.9% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Acacia Hills: 2.3% males, 1.1% females; 70–74 in Noonamah: 3.6% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Acacia Hills: 2.0% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Noonamah: 5.5% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Acacia Hills: 4.3% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Noonamah: 4.6% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Acacia Hills: 4.1% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Noonamah: 4.6% males, 5.5% females
- 50–54 in Acacia Hills: 4.3% males, 4.5% females; 50–54 in Noonamah: 4.3% males, 4.9% females
- 45–49 in Acacia Hills: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Noonamah: 4.6% males, 4.6% females
- 40–44 in Acacia Hills: 5.0% males, 5.1% females; 40–44 in Noonamah: 4.3% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Acacia Hills: 3.7% males, 4.5% females; 35–39 in Noonamah: 4.0% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Acacia Hills: 2.6% males, 2.0% females; 30–34 in Noonamah: 5.5% males, 1.2% females
- 25–29 in Acacia Hills: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Noonamah: 3.6% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Acacia Hills: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Noonamah: 0.9% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Acacia Hills: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 15–19 in Noonamah: 3.0% males, 1.2% females
- 10–14 in Acacia Hills: 4.0% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Noonamah: 0.9% males, 2.1% females
- 5–9 in Acacia Hills: 4.1% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Noonamah: 2.4% males, 1.8% females
- 0–4 in Acacia Hills: 1.7% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Noonamah: 1.5% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $687
- First area, 2016: $914
- First area, 2021: $1,077
- Second area, 2011: $708
- Second area, 2016: $809
- Second area, 2021: $920
- First area, 2011: $1,447
- First area, 2016: $2,024
- First area, 2021: $2,380
- Second area, 2011: $1,465
- Second area, 2016: $1,797
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: $1,937
- First area, 2016: $2,144
- First area, 2021: $2,619
- Second area, 2011: $1,874
- Second area, 2016: $2,088
- Second area, 2021: $2,200
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $355
- First area, 2021: $390
- Second area, 2011: $275
- Second area, 2016: $335
- Second area, 2021: $290
- First area, 2011: $2,383
- First area, 2016: $2,200
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $2,383
- Second area, 2016: $2,239
- Second area, 2021: $2,180
- First area, 2011: 1.30
- First area, 2016: 1.20
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.40
- Second area, 2016: 1.10
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Acacia Hills with nearby areas
Compare Noonamah with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Acacia Hills vs Noonamah [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL70001/acacia-hills/vs/SAL70212/noonamah