Compare
Acacia Hills vs Hughes
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.8 km apart · Acacia Hills profile · Hughes profile
Acacia Hills Hughes
Acacia Hills (NT) and Hughes (NT) are neighbouring rural areas with very different profiles. Acacia Hills (NT) is a more affluent area, where typical personal income is $1,077 a week and 12.2% of people earn $2,000 or more. In contrast, residents in Hughes (NT) are far older, with a typical age of 48 compared to 40 in Acacia Hills (NT). There is also a significant gap in home ownership, as 63.6% of homes in Hughes (NT) are owned outright, while only 26.2% are in Acacia Hills (NT).
Both areas have a similar proportion of First Nations people, sitting at around 8% of the population. They share a similar housing style, with almost every home being a separate house, and both lack walkable amenities or public transport. While Acacia Hills (NT) currently has more people living alone and a higher share of bachelor degrees, the two areas have remained alike in their low rates of public transport use and the typical number of people per home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 638
- First area, 2016: 694
- First area, 2021: 711
- Second area, 2016: 70
- Second area, 2021: 73
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Acacia Hills: 0.0% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Hughes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Acacia Hills: 0.0% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in Hughes: 0.0% males, 4.1% females
- 75–79 in Acacia Hills: 0.6% males, 0.4% females; 75–79 in Hughes: 0.0% males, 4.1% females
- 70–74 in Acacia Hills: 2.3% males, 1.1% females; 70–74 in Hughes: 5.5% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Acacia Hills: 2.0% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Hughes: 5.5% males, 5.5% females
- 60–64 in Acacia Hills: 4.3% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Hughes: 6.8% males, 5.5% females
- 55–59 in Acacia Hills: 4.1% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Hughes: 6.8% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Acacia Hills: 4.3% males, 4.5% females; 50–54 in Hughes: 0.0% males, 5.5% females
- 45–49 in Acacia Hills: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Hughes: 0.0% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Acacia Hills: 5.0% males, 5.1% females; 40–44 in Hughes: 0.0% males, 5.5% females
- 35–39 in Acacia Hills: 3.7% males, 4.5% females; 35–39 in Hughes: 5.5% males, 5.5% females
- 30–34 in Acacia Hills: 2.6% males, 2.0% females; 30–34 in Hughes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Acacia Hills: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Hughes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Acacia Hills: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Hughes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Acacia Hills: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 15–19 in Hughes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Acacia Hills: 4.0% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Hughes: 9.6% males, 9.6% females
- 5–9 in Acacia Hills: 4.1% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Hughes: 0.0% males, 6.8% females
- 0–4 in Acacia Hills: 1.7% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Hughes: 0.0% males, 4.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $687
- First area, 2016: $914
- First area, 2021: $1,077
- Second area, 2016: $619
- Second area, 2021: $674
- First area, 2011: $1,447
- First area, 2016: $2,024
- First area, 2021: $2,380
- Second area, 2016: $1,791
- Second area, 2021: $1,875
- First area, 2011: $1,937
- First area, 2016: $2,144
- First area, 2021: $2,619
- Second area, 2016: $1,791
- Second area, 2021: $1,812
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 3.5
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $355
- First area, 2021: $390
- Second area, 2021: $277
- First area, 2011: $2,383
- First area, 2016: $2,200
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $1,834
- Second area, 2021: $2,351
- First area, 2011: 1.30
- First area, 2016: 1.20
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 1.10
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Acacia Hills with nearby areas
Compare Hughes with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Acacia Hills vs Hughes [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL70001/acacia-hills/vs/SAL70131/hughes