Compare
South Stirling vs Stirling Range National Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 34 km apart · South Stirling profile · Stirling Range National Park profile
South Stirling Stirling Range National Park
South Stirling and Stirling Range National Park are both sparsely populated areas in Western Australia. South Stirling is largely non-residential with only 22 people, while Stirling Range National Park has no residents. South Stirling has a far higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park at 22.9%, and more amenity types within a 15-minute walk. The terrain in South Stirling is also a little steeper, with a mean slope of 3.6% compared to 2.5% in Stirling Range National Park.
Everyday life in both places is heavily reliant on cars, as both are described as car-dependent. Neither area has any homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, health services, schools, or public transport. These similarities show that both locations lack basic local infrastructure, regardless of their small populations.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 12
- First area, 2021: 22
- Second area, 2011: 0
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 0
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2016: $850
- First area, 2021: $962
- First area, 2016: $1,375
- First area, 2021: $2,250
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 1.0
- First area, 2021: 2.0
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: 0.20
- First area, 2021: 0.60
Transport & Vehicles
Walkability
Compare South Stirling with nearby areas
Compare Stirling Range National Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). South Stirling vs Stirling Range National Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL51384/south-stirling/vs/SAL51407/stirling-range-national-park