Compare
North Stirlings vs Stirling Range National Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 22 km apart · North Stirlings profile · Stirling Range National Park profile
North Stirlings Stirling Range National Park
North Stirlings and Stirling Range National Park are both sparsely populated areas in Western Australia. North Stirlings is very small with just 26 people, while Stirling Range National Park is largely non-residential with no population. The two areas differ slightly in their landscape, as the mean terrain slope is a little higher in North Stirlings at 4.9% compared to 2.5% in Stirling Range National Park.
Both areas are completely car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of schools, parks, groceries or health services. This total lack of local amenities is consistent across both places, which sit well below the national figure for walkability.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 27
- First area, 2021: 26
- Second area, 2011: 0
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 0
- First area, 2016: 32 yrs
- First area, 2021: 29 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2016: $1,156
- First area, 2021: $1,374
- First area, 2016: $2,250
- First area, 2021: $2,250
- First area, 2016: $2,374
- First area, 2021: $2,749
Health & Disability
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 3.5
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.80
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Walkability
Compare North Stirlings with nearby areas
Compare Stirling Range National Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). North Stirlings vs Stirling Range National Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL51149/north-stirlings/vs/SAL51407/stirling-range-national-park