Compare
North Coogee vs White Gum Valley
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.7 km apart · North Coogee profile · White Gum Valley profile
North Coogee White Gum Valley
North Coogee and White Gum Valley are neighbouring areas with distinct housing and economic profiles. North Coogee has a wealthier population, with 42.3% of households earning $3,000 or more a week compared to 27.8% in White Gum Valley. It is also more mobile, with 60.0% of residents having moved in the last five years. In contrast, White Gum Valley is dominated by separate houses (81.2% compared to 47.3% in North Coogee) and is more secular, with 57.0% of people reporting no religion. This area also has a higher share of one-parent families, at 14.7% compared to 4.5% in North Coogee.
Both areas are almost identical when it comes to the share of adults working or looking for work, which is 67.4% in each. They also share a similar urban feel, with every home in both places within a 15-minute walk of a park. While White Gum Valley is more walkable for public transport and health services, North Coogee is better for those walking to groceries. Over time, the gap in the typical age of residents has remained, with people in North Coogee being noticeably older at 46 compared to 41 in White Gum Valley.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 579
- First area, 2016: 2,388
- First area, 2021: 3,741
- Second area, 2011: 2,734
- Second area, 2016: 2,960
- Second area, 2021: 3,358
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in North Coogee: 0.7% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in White Gum Valley: 1.7% males, 2.2% females
- 80–84 in North Coogee: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in White Gum Valley: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in North Coogee: 1.5% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in White Gum Valley: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in North Coogee: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in White Gum Valley: 1.5% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in North Coogee: 3.7% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in White Gum Valley: 2.9% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in North Coogee: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in White Gum Valley: 3.2% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in North Coogee: 4.1% males, 5.4% females; 55–59 in White Gum Valley: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in North Coogee: 4.3% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in White Gum Valley: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in North Coogee: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in White Gum Valley: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in North Coogee: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in White Gum Valley: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in North Coogee: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in White Gum Valley: 3.3% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in North Coogee: 3.4% males, 4.1% females; 30–34 in White Gum Valley: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in North Coogee: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in White Gum Valley: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in North Coogee: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in White Gum Valley: 2.1% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in North Coogee: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 15–19 in White Gum Valley: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in North Coogee: 2.1% males, 1.9% females; 10–14 in White Gum Valley: 2.2% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in North Coogee: 2.2% males, 1.7% females; 5–9 in White Gum Valley: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in North Coogee: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in White Gum Valley: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,179
- First area, 2016: $1,166
- First area, 2021: $1,238
- Second area, 2011: $637
- Second area, 2016: $759
- Second area, 2021: $930
- First area, 2011: $2,764
- First area, 2016: $2,485
- First area, 2021: $2,566
- Second area, 2011: $1,190
- Second area, 2016: $1,550
- Second area, 2021: $1,891
- First area, 2011: $2,976
- First area, 2016: $3,089
- First area, 2021: $3,265
- Second area, 2011: $1,849
- Second area, 2016: $2,202
- Second area, 2021: $2,630
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $680
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $460
- Second area, 2011: $298
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2011: $4,635
- First area, 2016: $2,860
- First area, 2021: $2,817
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare North Coogee with nearby areas
Compare White Gum Valley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). North Coogee vs White Gum Valley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL51135/north-coogee/vs/SAL51593/white-gum-valley