Compare
Fremantle vs White Gum Valley
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.8 km apart · Fremantle profile · White Gum Valley profile
Fremantle White Gum Valley
Fremantle and White Gum Valley are neighbouring areas with very different housing and lifestyles. Fremantle is a hub of activity with a far higher share of renters (41.5%) and people living alone (40.6%), while White Gum Valley is much more residential, with 81.2% of homes being separate houses compared to just 39.9% in Fremantle. This difference is reflected in the homes themselves; White Gum Valley has a far higher share of three-bedroom properties (69.3% versus 46.8%). Fremantle also offers much better access to services, with a far higher number of public transport routes and 97.8% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining very alike in their typical resident age of 41 and their typical household incomes. They also share a similar level of volunteerism and a high share of people who do not follow a religion. However, Fremantle remains more transit-oriented, with a well higher share of homes without a motor vehicle (11.9%) and far more public transport stops per 1,000 people than White Gum Valley.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,669
- First area, 2016: 8,211
- First area, 2021: 9,251
- Second area, 2011: 2,734
- Second area, 2016: 2,960
- Second area, 2021: 3,358
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Fremantle: 0.7% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in White Gum Valley: 1.7% males, 2.2% females
- 80–84 in Fremantle: 1.0% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in White Gum Valley: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Fremantle: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in White Gum Valley: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Fremantle: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in White Gum Valley: 1.5% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Fremantle: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in White Gum Valley: 2.9% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Fremantle: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 60–64 in White Gum Valley: 3.2% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Fremantle: 3.9% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in White Gum Valley: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Fremantle: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in White Gum Valley: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Fremantle: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in White Gum Valley: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Fremantle: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in White Gum Valley: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Fremantle: 4.2% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in White Gum Valley: 3.3% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in Fremantle: 4.5% males, 4.8% females; 30–34 in White Gum Valley: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Fremantle: 4.3% males, 4.7% females; 25–29 in White Gum Valley: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Fremantle: 3.1% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in White Gum Valley: 2.1% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Fremantle: 1.9% males, 2.1% females; 15–19 in White Gum Valley: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Fremantle: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 10–14 in White Gum Valley: 2.2% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Fremantle: 1.7% males, 1.5% females; 5–9 in White Gum Valley: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Fremantle: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 0–4 in White Gum Valley: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $773
- First area, 2016: $817
- First area, 2021: $1,021
- Second area, 2011: $637
- Second area, 2016: $759
- Second area, 2021: $930
- First area, 2011: $1,397
- First area, 2016: $1,548
- First area, 2021: $1,822
- Second area, 2011: $1,190
- Second area, 2016: $1,550
- Second area, 2021: $1,891
- First area, 2011: $2,145
- First area, 2016: $2,252
- First area, 2021: $2,713
- Second area, 2011: $1,849
- Second area, 2016: $2,202
- Second area, 2021: $2,630
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.0
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2011: $298
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2011: $2,263
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Fremantle with nearby areas
Compare White Gum Valley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Fremantle vs White Gum Valley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50522/fremantle/vs/SAL51593/white-gum-valley