Compare
Hilton vs White Gum Valley
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.7 km apart · Hilton profile · White Gum Valley profile
Hilton White Gum Valley
Hilton (WA) and White Gum Valley are neighbouring areas with similar population sizes, but they differ in their layout and wealth. White Gum Valley has more high earners, with 27.8% of homes earning $3,000 or more a week compared to 22.3% in Hilton (WA). It also has more residents with university degrees (39.0% versus 32.4%) and a higher share of homes owned outright. In contrast, Hilton (WA) is more walkable for daily needs, with 99.6% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, and it has a larger First Nations population of 128 people.
A gap is widening in how the two areas are built, with White Gum Valley now having far more street intersections and walkable amenities per person. Both areas are alike in other ways, such as having the same share of people providing unpaid care (11.4%) and the same typical household size of 2.4 people. While both have a high proportion of residents born overseas, this is slightly more common in White Gum Valley at 28.9%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,575
- First area, 2016: 3,934
- First area, 2021: 4,323
- Second area, 2011: 2,734
- Second area, 2016: 2,960
- Second area, 2021: 3,358
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Hilton: 1.3% males, 2.8% females; 85+ in White Gum Valley: 1.7% males, 2.2% females
- 80–84 in Hilton: 1.1% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in White Gum Valley: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Hilton: 1.1% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in White Gum Valley: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Hilton: 1.4% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in White Gum Valley: 1.5% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Hilton: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in White Gum Valley: 2.9% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Hilton: 1.9% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in White Gum Valley: 3.2% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Hilton: 2.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in White Gum Valley: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Hilton: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in White Gum Valley: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Hilton: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in White Gum Valley: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Hilton: 3.6% males, 4.3% females; 40–44 in White Gum Valley: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Hilton: 4.3% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in White Gum Valley: 3.3% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in Hilton: 3.8% males, 4.3% females; 30–34 in White Gum Valley: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Hilton: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 25–29 in White Gum Valley: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Hilton: 2.7% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in White Gum Valley: 2.1% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Hilton: 2.4% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in White Gum Valley: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Hilton: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in White Gum Valley: 2.2% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Hilton: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in White Gum Valley: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Hilton: 4.1% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in White Gum Valley: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $559
- First area, 2016: $692
- First area, 2021: $842
- Second area, 2011: $637
- Second area, 2016: $759
- Second area, 2021: $930
- First area, 2011: $1,037
- First area, 2016: $1,406
- First area, 2021: $1,714
- Second area, 2011: $1,190
- Second area, 2016: $1,550
- Second area, 2021: $1,891
- First area, 2011: $1,385
- First area, 2016: $1,837
- First area, 2021: $2,283
- Second area, 2011: $1,849
- Second area, 2016: $2,202
- Second area, 2021: $2,630
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $235
- First area, 2016: $285
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $298
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $1,950
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Hilton with nearby areas
Compare White Gum Valley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Hilton vs White Gum Valley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50641/hilton/vs/SAL51593/white-gum-valley