Compare
Nanga vs Useless Loop
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 74 km apart · Nanga profile · Useless Loop profile
Nanga Useless Loop
Useless Loop and Nanga are both remote areas in Western Australia, though they differ sharply in population and wealth. Useless Loop has 134 residents and is far more affluent, with a typical personal income of $1,770 per week compared to just $350 in Nanga. The typical resident in Useless Loop is also much younger at 35, while the typical person in Nanga is 53. Useless Loop is more developed for its size, with one school and a population of 20 First Nations people, whereas Nanga is sparsely populated with only 4 residents.
Both areas are entirely dependent on cars, with 0% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport or a 15-minute walk of health services and groceries. This shared isolation is a key part of life in both places, even though Useless Loop has a slightly higher walkability score. While Useless Loop has more people per home, Nanga has a much higher number of people per bedroom.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 12
- First area, 2021: 4
- Second area, 2016: 138
- Second area, 2021: 134
- First area, 2016: 58 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Income
- First area, 2016: $487
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2016: $1,687
- Second area, 2021: $1,770
- First area, 2016: $374
- First area, 2021: $900
- Second area, 2016: $2,089
- Second area, 2021: $2,461
- First area, 2021: $900
- Second area, 2016: $2,208
- Second area, 2021: $2,571
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 1.0
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 2.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare Nanga with nearby areas
Compare Useless Loop with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Nanga vs Useless Loop [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL51079/nanga/vs/SAL51484/useless-loop