Compare
Nanga vs Tamala
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 31 km apart · Nanga profile · Tamala profile
Nanga Tamala
Tamala and Nanga are both sparsely populated areas in Western Australia. There are notable differences between them, with residents far older in Tamala, where the typical age is 61 compared to 53 in Nanga. Weekly personal income is far higher in Tamala at $850, while typical weekly household income is far higher in Nanga at $900. In Nanga, homes are larger, with two people per home compared to just one person per home in Tamala.
Everyday life in both places is very similar, as both are car-dependent and have no public transport or nearby shops and schools. Both areas are far older than the national figure, and they share a lack of walkable amenities. These patterns have remained stable, with the gaps between them staying the same across recent censuses.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 12
- First area, 2021: 4
- Second area, 2016: 3
- Second area, 2021: 5
Age structure
Marital status
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Income
- First area, 2016: $487
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2021: $850
- First area, 2016: $374
- First area, 2021: $900
- Second area, 2021: $350
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
Transport & Vehicles
Walkability
Compare Nanga with nearby areas
Compare Tamala with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Nanga vs Tamala [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL51079/nanga/vs/SAL51428/tamala