Compare
Forrestfield vs Kalamunda
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.8 km apart · Forrestfield profile · Kalamunda profile
Forrestfield Kalamunda
Forrestfield and Kalamunda are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Kalamunda is much older, with a typical resident aged 49 compared to 38 in Forrestfield, and 28.4% of its people are seniors. Residents in Kalamunda also have higher levels of education, with 26.3% holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 13.4% in Forrestfield. Home ownership differs sharply too, as 49.1% of Kalamunda homes are owned outright, while only 27.6% are in Forrestfield.
These two areas share a very similar typical weekly household income of around $1,600. They are also alike in the number of people per home and the typical weekly rent. While they share these economic basics, the gap in home ownership is far higher in Kalamunda. Meanwhile, Forrestfield has a much larger First Nations population, with 467 people compared to 71 in Kalamunda.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,811
- First area, 2016: 12,690
- First area, 2021: 13,181
- Second area, 2011: 6,636
- Second area, 2016: 6,970
- Second area, 2021: 7,163
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 49 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Forrestfield: 0.8% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Kalamunda: 1.5% males, 2.4% females
- 80–84 in Forrestfield: 0.9% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Kalamunda: 1.9% males, 2.5% females
- 75–79 in Forrestfield: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Kalamunda: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 70–74 in Forrestfield: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 70–74 in Kalamunda: 3.7% males, 4.5% females
- 65–69 in Forrestfield: 2.5% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Kalamunda: 2.7% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Forrestfield: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Kalamunda: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Forrestfield: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Kalamunda: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Forrestfield: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Kalamunda: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Forrestfield: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Kalamunda: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Forrestfield: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Kalamunda: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Forrestfield: 4.0% males, 3.8% females; 35–39 in Kalamunda: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Forrestfield: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 30–34 in Kalamunda: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 25–29 in Forrestfield: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Kalamunda: 1.4% males, 1.8% females
- 20–24 in Forrestfield: 3.2% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Kalamunda: 2.8% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Forrestfield: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Kalamunda: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Forrestfield: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Kalamunda: 3.6% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Forrestfield: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Kalamunda: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Forrestfield: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Kalamunda: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $646
- First area, 2016: $711
- First area, 2021: $810
- Second area, 2011: $621
- Second area, 2016: $676
- Second area, 2021: $773
- First area, 2011: $1,302
- First area, 2016: $1,459
- First area, 2021: $1,614
- Second area, 2011: $1,322
- Second area, 2016: $1,509
- Second area, 2021: $1,622
- First area, 2011: $1,558
- First area, 2016: $1,714
- First area, 2021: $1,982
- Second area, 2011: $1,718
- Second area, 2016: $1,972
- Second area, 2021: $2,199
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $360
- First area, 2011: $1,842
- First area, 2016: $1,858
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,100
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Forrestfield with nearby areas
Compare Kalamunda with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Forrestfield vs Kalamunda [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50518/forrestfield/vs/SAL50707/kalamunda