Compare
Bickley vs Kalamunda
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.9 km apart · Bickley profile · Kalamunda profile
Bickley Kalamunda
Kalamunda and Bickley are neighbouring areas with very different layouts. Kalamunda is a very walkable hub where 71.2% of homes are within 15 minutes of groceries and many residents live alone (24.8%). In contrast, Bickley is car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of health services or groceries. Bickley is also wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $2,241 compared to $1,622 in Kalamunda, and a much higher share of households earning over $3,000 a week (35.2% versus 24.5%).
Both areas share a similar feel in other ways, such as having nearly the same percentage of children under 15 and very similar typical weekly rents. This consistency extends to their connection to the city, as the drive time is almost identical for both. While they track together on these basics, the gap in accessibility is stark: Kalamunda has frequent public transport and a walkability score of 6.1, while Bickley has no public transport stops and a score of 1.3.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 707
- First area, 2016: 673
- First area, 2021: 713
- Second area, 2011: 6,636
- Second area, 2016: 6,970
- Second area, 2021: 7,163
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 49 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bickley: 1.4% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Kalamunda: 1.5% males, 2.4% females
- 80–84 in Bickley: 0.8% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Kalamunda: 1.9% males, 2.5% females
- 75–79 in Bickley: 1.8% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Kalamunda: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 70–74 in Bickley: 3.4% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Kalamunda: 3.7% males, 4.5% females
- 65–69 in Bickley: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 65–69 in Kalamunda: 2.7% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Bickley: 3.9% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Kalamunda: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Bickley: 3.9% males, 5.0% females; 55–59 in Kalamunda: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Bickley: 4.6% males, 4.5% females; 50–54 in Kalamunda: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Bickley: 4.1% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Kalamunda: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Bickley: 2.0% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Kalamunda: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Bickley: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 35–39 in Kalamunda: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Bickley: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 30–34 in Kalamunda: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 25–29 in Bickley: 2.7% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Kalamunda: 1.4% males, 1.8% females
- 20–24 in Bickley: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 20–24 in Kalamunda: 2.8% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Bickley: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Kalamunda: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Bickley: 4.8% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Kalamunda: 3.6% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Bickley: 3.6% males, 2.0% females; 5–9 in Kalamunda: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Bickley: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 0–4 in Kalamunda: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $697
- First area, 2016: $616
- First area, 2021: $809
- Second area, 2011: $621
- Second area, 2016: $676
- Second area, 2021: $773
- First area, 2011: $2,087
- First area, 2016: $1,985
- First area, 2021: $2,241
- Second area, 2011: $1,322
- Second area, 2016: $1,509
- Second area, 2021: $1,622
- First area, 2011: $2,301
- First area, 2016: $2,327
- First area, 2021: $2,393
- Second area, 2011: $1,718
- Second area, 2016: $1,972
- Second area, 2021: $2,199
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $238
- First area, 2016: $431
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $360
- First area, 2011: $2,500
- First area, 2016: $2,435
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,100
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bickley with nearby areas
Compare Kalamunda with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bickley vs Kalamunda [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50118/bickley/vs/SAL50707/kalamunda