Compare
Deanmill vs Diamond Tree
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 10 km apart · Deanmill profile · Diamond Tree profile
Deanmill Diamond Tree
Deanmill and Diamond Tree are nearby Western Australian areas with very different profiles. Deanmill is more populated and has a stronger volunteering culture, with 25.9% of people volunteering compared to 11.5% in Diamond Tree. Employment patterns also differ sharply; full-time work is far higher in Deanmill at 59.7%, while 40.0% of people in Diamond Tree work from home. In contrast, Diamond Tree has a more qualified workforce, with 54.2% completing Year 12 and a typical weekly household income of $2,374, which is well higher than the $1,511 seen in Deanmill.
Both areas sit near the national figure for full-time employment in Deanmill and adults working or looking for work in Diamond Tree. They are also effectively alike in that no one uses public transport to commute and no homes are within a 15-minute walk of a school or health service. While Deanmill has more one-parent families and a higher share of people with no religion, Diamond Tree has more children under 15 and a higher proportion of residents born overseas.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 425
- First area, 2016: 328
- First area, 2021: 327
- Second area, 2016: 23
- Second area, 2021: 28
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Deanmill: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Deanmill: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Deanmill: 1.3% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Deanmill: 0.9% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Deanmill: 2.8% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 15.8% females
- 60–64 in Deanmill: 6.6% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Diamond Tree: 15.8% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Deanmill: 3.8% males, 7.2% females; 55–59 in Diamond Tree: 21.1% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Deanmill: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Deanmill: 3.4% males, 4.4% females; 45–49 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Deanmill: 0.9% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Deanmill: 3.8% males, 4.7% females; 35–39 in Diamond Tree: 15.8% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Deanmill: 2.2% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Deanmill: 3.4% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Deanmill: 1.3% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Deanmill: 4.1% males, 5.3% females; 15–19 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Deanmill: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Diamond Tree: 15.8% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Deanmill: 5.0% males, 7.2% females; 5–9 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 15.8% females
- 0–4 in Deanmill: 3.8% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Diamond Tree: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $579
- First area, 2016: $591
- First area, 2021: $705
- Second area, 2016: $833
- Second area, 2021: $1,024
- First area, 2011: $1,017
- First area, 2016: $1,132
- First area, 2021: $1,511
- Second area, 2016: $1,812
- Second area, 2021: $2,374
- First area, 2011: $1,260
- First area, 2016: $1,512
- First area, 2021: $1,821
- Second area, 2016: $1,749
- Second area, 2021: $2,749
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $130
- First area, 2016: $160
- First area, 2021: $195
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,625
- First area, 2021: $1,941
- Second area, 2021: $3,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Deanmill with nearby areas
Compare Diamond Tree with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Deanmill vs Diamond Tree [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50399/deanmill/vs/SAL50408/diamond-tree