Compare
Carey Park vs East Bunbury
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.1 km apart · Carey Park profile · East Bunbury profile
Carey Park East Bunbury
Carey Park and East Bunbury are neighbouring areas in Western Australia. Carey Park has a younger feel, with a typical resident aged 40, and is more likely to be rented (45.3%) than East Bunbury (29.2%). One-parent families are far more common in Carey Park at 29.0%, compared to 17.4% in East Bunbury. While East Bunbury has a higher share of homes owned outright (36.0%) and more residents aged 65 and over (26.2%), Carey Park offers better walking access to health services for 65.0% of homes, compared to just 35.0% in East Bunbury.
Everyday life is quite similar across both places, as they share the same average number of people per home and nearly identical rates of people using other languages at home. They also have almost the same amount of people providing unpaid care. Both areas sit well above the national figure for the share of people who identify as having no religion, though this is still higher in Carey Park at 49.8%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,039
- First area, 2016: 5,168
- First area, 2021: 5,155
- Second area, 2011: 4,011
- Second area, 2016: 3,912
- Second area, 2021: 4,019
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Carey Park: 1.0% males, 2.3% females; 85+ in East Bunbury: 1.5% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Carey Park: 1.1% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in East Bunbury: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
- 75–79 in Carey Park: 1.5% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in East Bunbury: 2.5% males, 3.0% females
- 70–74 in Carey Park: 2.0% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in East Bunbury: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Carey Park: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in East Bunbury: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 60–64 in Carey Park: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in East Bunbury: 3.1% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Carey Park: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 55–59 in East Bunbury: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Carey Park: 2.7% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in East Bunbury: 3.0% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Carey Park: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in East Bunbury: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Carey Park: 2.7% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in East Bunbury: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Carey Park: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in East Bunbury: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Carey Park: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 30–34 in East Bunbury: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Carey Park: 3.1% males, 3.7% females; 25–29 in East Bunbury: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Carey Park: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 20–24 in East Bunbury: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Carey Park: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in East Bunbury: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Carey Park: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in East Bunbury: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 5–9 in Carey Park: 3.0% males, 2.4% females; 5–9 in East Bunbury: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Carey Park: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in East Bunbury: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $505
- First area, 2016: $561
- First area, 2021: $592
- Second area, 2011: $534
- Second area, 2016: $582
- Second area, 2021: $679
- First area, 2011: $930
- First area, 2016: $986
- First area, 2021: $1,018
- Second area, 2011: $969
- Second area, 2016: $1,060
- Second area, 2021: $1,193
- First area, 2011: $1,146
- First area, 2016: $1,286
- First area, 2021: $1,335
- Second area, 2011: $1,311
- Second area, 2016: $1,373
- Second area, 2021: $1,603
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $245
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $270
- Second area, 2011: $250
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,387
- First area, 2016: $1,402
- First area, 2021: $1,261
- Second area, 2011: $1,636
- Second area, 2016: $1,547
- Second area, 2021: $1,470
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Carey Park with nearby areas
Compare East Bunbury with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Carey Park vs East Bunbury [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50261/carey-park/vs/SAL50452/east-bunbury