Compare
Mount Schank vs Racecourse Bay
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 13 km apart · Mount Schank profile · Racecourse Bay profile
Mount Schank Racecourse Bay
Mount Schank and Racecourse Bay are nearby South Australian areas with very different profiles. Mount Schank has a typical resident aged 38 and higher incomes, with typical weekly household earnings of $1,968. In contrast, Racecourse Bay is sparsely populated and much older, with a typical age of 53 and a typical weekly household income of $1,125. This age gap is stark, as people aged 65 and over make up 48.1% of Racecourse Bay, compared to just 12.1% in Mount Schank.
Both areas are equally car-dependent and have no residents who speak a language other than English at home. This shared lack of public transport and infrastructure is consistent across the pair, and both have a similar proportion of residents who finished Year 12. While Mount Schank has more volunteers and a higher share of people with bachelor degrees, both areas sit well below the national figure for university qualifications.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 317
- First area, 2016: 249
- First area, 2021: 264
- Second area, 2016: 33
- Second area, 2021: 27
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 53 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Schank: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Mount Schank: 1.7% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Mount Schank: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Mount Schank: 4.3% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Racecourse Bay: 33.3% males, 20.0% females
- 65–69 in Mount Schank: 4.7% males, 1.3% females; 65–69 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Mount Schank: 3.0% males, 4.7% females; 60–64 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Mount Schank: 1.7% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Mount Schank: 4.3% males, 1.7% females; 50–54 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 26.7% females
- 45–49 in Mount Schank: 3.8% males, 5.1% females; 45–49 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Mount Schank: 3.4% males, 1.7% females; 40–44 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Mount Schank: 3.4% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Mount Schank: 2.1% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Mount Schank: 1.3% males, 1.3% females; 25–29 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Mount Schank: 2.1% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Mount Schank: 1.3% males, 3.8% females; 15–19 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Mount Schank: 3.4% males, 6.4% females; 10–14 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Mount Schank: 3.4% males, 6.0% females; 5–9 in Racecourse Bay: 20.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Mount Schank: 4.7% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Racecourse Bay: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $643
- First area, 2016: $804
- First area, 2021: $949
- Second area, 2016: $619
- Second area, 2021: $669
- First area, 2011: $1,426
- First area, 2016: $1,489
- First area, 2021: $1,968
- Second area, 2016: $1,125
- Second area, 2021: $1,125
- First area, 2011: $1,363
- First area, 2016: $1,875
- First area, 2021: $2,305
- Second area, 2016: $1,374
- Second area, 2021: $1,375
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $85
- First area, 2016: $92
- First area, 2021: $150
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $996
- First area, 2016: $1,636
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.50
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Mount Schank with nearby areas
Compare Racecourse Bay with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Schank vs Racecourse Bay [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40961/mount-schank/vs/SAL41234/racecourse-bay