Compare
Mount Schank vs Port Macdonnell
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 10 km apart · Mount Schank profile · Port Macdonnell profile
Mount Schank Port Macdonnell
Port Macdonnell and Mount Schank are two nearby South Australian areas with very different populations. Port Macdonnell is much older, with a typical resident aged 53 and 30.3% of people aged 65 and over. In contrast, Mount Schank is much younger, where the typical age is 38 and children under 15 make up 25.4% of the population. Port Macdonnell has a higher share of people living alone (29.2%) and more homes owned outright (50.7%), while Mount Schank has more people working or looking for work (73.8%) and more homes with three or more bedrooms (88.0%).
These two places have tracked differently over time, with the gap in crime rates widening as Port Macdonnell has seen a 22.2% increase in crime while Mount Schank has seen no change. They do share some similarities, such as having almost the same share of people who have no religion and an identical average school size. Port Macdonnell is also more walkable, rated as mostly car-dependent, while Mount Schank is car-dependent.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 317
- First area, 2016: 249
- First area, 2021: 264
- Second area, 2011: 1,036
- Second area, 2016: 847
- Second area, 2021: 859
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 53 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Schank: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Port Macdonnell: 1.0% males, 2.0% females
- 80–84 in Mount Schank: 1.7% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Port Macdonnell: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Mount Schank: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Port Macdonnell: 1.6% males, 2.6% females
- 70–74 in Mount Schank: 4.3% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Port Macdonnell: 6.2% males, 5.0% females
- 65–69 in Mount Schank: 4.7% males, 1.3% females; 65–69 in Port Macdonnell: 3.9% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Mount Schank: 3.0% males, 4.7% females; 60–64 in Port Macdonnell: 3.9% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Mount Schank: 1.7% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Port Macdonnell: 5.0% males, 4.9% females
- 50–54 in Mount Schank: 4.3% males, 1.7% females; 50–54 in Port Macdonnell: 4.3% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Mount Schank: 3.8% males, 5.1% females; 45–49 in Port Macdonnell: 2.7% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Mount Schank: 3.4% males, 1.7% females; 40–44 in Port Macdonnell: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 35–39 in Mount Schank: 3.4% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Port Macdonnell: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 30–34 in Mount Schank: 2.1% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Port Macdonnell: 1.5% males, 1.6% females
- 25–29 in Mount Schank: 1.3% males, 1.3% females; 25–29 in Port Macdonnell: 2.2% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Mount Schank: 2.1% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Port Macdonnell: 1.9% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Mount Schank: 1.3% males, 3.8% females; 15–19 in Port Macdonnell: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Mount Schank: 3.4% males, 6.4% females; 10–14 in Port Macdonnell: 2.2% males, 1.6% females
- 5–9 in Mount Schank: 3.4% males, 6.0% females; 5–9 in Port Macdonnell: 2.3% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Mount Schank: 4.7% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Port Macdonnell: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $643
- First area, 2016: $804
- First area, 2021: $949
- Second area, 2011: $471
- Second area, 2016: $531
- Second area, 2021: $762
- First area, 2011: $1,426
- First area, 2016: $1,489
- First area, 2021: $1,968
- Second area, 2011: $855
- Second area, 2016: $1,057
- Second area, 2021: $1,288
- First area, 2011: $1,363
- First area, 2016: $1,875
- First area, 2021: $2,305
- Second area, 2011: $1,014
- Second area, 2016: $1,414
- Second area, 2021: $1,757
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $85
- First area, 2016: $92
- First area, 2021: $150
- Second area, 2011: $135
- Second area, 2016: $150
- Second area, 2021: $210
- First area, 2011: $996
- First area, 2016: $1,636
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,200
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Mount Schank with nearby areas
Compare Port Macdonnell with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Schank vs Port Macdonnell [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40961/mount-schank/vs/SAL41202/port-macdonnell