Compare
Rifle Range vs Tarampa
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.5 km apart · Rifle Range profile · Tarampa profile
Rifle Range Tarampa
Tarampa and Rifle Range are neighbouring areas in Queensland with different demographic profiles. Tarampa is an older area, with a typical resident aged 52 compared to 41 in Rifle Range. This age gap is reflected in health and housing; residents in Tarampa are far more likely to have long-term health conditions or need help with daily activities, and 47.6% of homes are owned outright. In contrast, Rifle Range has a younger feel, with children under 15 making up 22.8% of the population, and a higher share of people working or looking for work at 63.5%.
While these two areas differ in age and health, they are nearly identical in their housing styles, with both consisting entirely of separate houses. They also share a similar lack of public transport, as both have no public transport stops. The gap in home ownership is widening, as Tarampa's share of homes owned outright is now 19 points higher than in Rifle Range.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 186
- First area, 2021: 197
- Second area, 2011: 325
- Second area, 2016: 289
- Second area, 2021: 287
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rifle Range: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Tarampa: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Rifle Range: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Tarampa: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Rifle Range: 3.2% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Tarampa: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Rifle Range: 0.0% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Tarampa: 6.9% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Rifle Range: 4.8% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Tarampa: 4.5% males, 1.4% females
- 60–64 in Rifle Range: 1.6% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Tarampa: 6.2% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Rifle Range: 6.9% males, 4.2% females; 55–59 in Tarampa: 7.3% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Rifle Range: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 50–54 in Tarampa: 5.2% males, 5.2% females
- 45–49 in Rifle Range: 4.2% males, 7.4% females; 45–49 in Tarampa: 4.5% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Rifle Range: 4.2% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Tarampa: 2.8% males, 1.7% females
- 35–39 in Rifle Range: 2.6% males, 5.3% females; 35–39 in Tarampa: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 30–34 in Rifle Range: 0.0% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Tarampa: 2.1% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Rifle Range: 1.6% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Tarampa: 3.5% males, 1.4% females
- 20–24 in Rifle Range: 4.2% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Tarampa: 2.1% males, 1.4% females
- 15–19 in Rifle Range: 2.1% males, 4.8% females; 15–19 in Tarampa: 1.0% males, 3.8% females
- 10–14 in Rifle Range: 9.0% males, 1.6% females; 10–14 in Tarampa: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Rifle Range: 5.3% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Tarampa: 1.0% males, 1.0% females
- 0–4 in Rifle Range: 2.1% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Tarampa: 3.5% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $655
- First area, 2021: $519
- Second area, 2011: $364
- Second area, 2016: $558
- Second area, 2021: $611
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,187
- Second area, 2011: $1,166
- Second area, 2016: $1,261
- Second area, 2021: $1,649
- First area, 2016: $1,292
- First area, 2021: $1,687
- Second area, 2011: $1,212
- Second area, 2016: $1,347
- Second area, 2021: $1,781
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $290
- First area, 2021: $330
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $283
- First area, 2016: $1,408
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,452
- Second area, 2016: $1,694
- Second area, 2021: $1,977
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Rifle Range with nearby areas
Compare Tarampa with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rifle Range vs Tarampa [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL32429/rifle-range/vs/SAL32747/tarampa