Compare
Norwell vs Pimpama
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.3 km apart · Norwell profile · Pimpama profile
Norwell Pimpama
Pimpama and Norwell are neighbours with very different characters. Pimpama is a large, young area where 27.5% of people are children under 15, and the typical resident is only 29. Residents are far more likely to be born overseas (29.5%) or use another language at home (15.7%). In contrast, Norwell is sparsely populated and much older, with a typical age of 43. Housing also differs sharply; Pimpama has a high rental rate of 56.9%, while 33.9% of homes in Norwell are owned outright.
These two areas are drifting further apart as Pimpama grows and changes. While they share a similar typical weekly family income of around $1,900, Pimpama has become far more connected with a high number of public transport stops and parks within walking distance. Norwell remains more rural and car-dependent, with 100% of homes being separate houses. This gap in mobility and infrastructure has widened as Pimpama sees a huge influx of new residents, with 73.8% moving there in the last five years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 282
- First area, 2016: 200
- First area, 2021: 189
- Second area, 2011: 3,211
- Second area, 2016: 9,396
- Second area, 2021: 24,601
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 27 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 29 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Norwell: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Pimpama: 0.1% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Norwell: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Pimpama: 0.3% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Norwell: 3.3% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Pimpama: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Norwell: 5.5% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Pimpama: 1.1% males, 1.1% females
- 65–69 in Norwell: 2.7% males, 5.5% females; 65–69 in Pimpama: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Norwell: 3.3% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Pimpama: 1.2% males, 1.4% females
- 55–59 in Norwell: 3.8% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Pimpama: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 50–54 in Norwell: 3.3% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Pimpama: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
- 45–49 in Norwell: 4.4% males, 4.9% females; 45–49 in Pimpama: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
- 40–44 in Norwell: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 40–44 in Pimpama: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Norwell: 2.2% males, 5.5% females; 35–39 in Pimpama: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
- 30–34 in Norwell: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Pimpama: 5.1% males, 5.8% females
- 25–29 in Norwell: 3.8% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Pimpama: 5.3% males, 6.1% females
- 20–24 in Norwell: 0.0% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Pimpama: 3.6% males, 4.3% females
- 15–19 in Norwell: 5.5% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Pimpama: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Norwell: 4.9% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Pimpama: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Norwell: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Pimpama: 4.9% males, 4.4% females
- 0–4 in Norwell: 4.9% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Pimpama: 5.4% males, 5.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $532
- First area, 2016: $655
- First area, 2021: $694
- Second area, 2011: $702
- Second area, 2016: $750
- Second area, 2021: $856
- First area, 2011: $1,160
- First area, 2016: $1,449
- First area, 2021: $1,562
- Second area, 2011: $1,459
- Second area, 2016: $1,596
- Second area, 2021: $1,863
- First area, 2011: $1,437
- First area, 2016: $1,600
- First area, 2021: $1,875
- Second area, 2011: $1,511
- Second area, 2016: $1,603
- Second area, 2021: $1,906
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $101
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $365
- Second area, 2016: $410
- Second area, 2021: $440
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $1,690
- First area, 2021: $1,997
- Second area, 2011: $2,400
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,978
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Norwell with nearby areas
Compare Pimpama with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Norwell vs Pimpama [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL32191/norwell/vs/SAL32318/pimpama