Compare
Jacobs Well vs Pimpama
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.2 km apart · Jacobs Well profile · Pimpama profile
Jacobs Well Pimpama
Pimpama and Jacobs Well are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Pimpama is a young hub where the typical resident is 29, and 56.9% of homes are rented. In contrast, residents in Jacobs Well are far older with a typical age of 42, and home ownership is more common, with 28.2% of homes owned outright. Pimpama is also more diverse and better connected, with 15.7% of people using another language at home and 93.4% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport, while only 66.8% of homes in Jacobs Well share that access.
Both areas sit close to the national figure for adults working or looking for work, at around 68%. They also share similar typical weekly rents, ranging from $440 in Pimpama to $465 in Jacobs Well. While Pimpama has seen more growth, with 73.8% of people moving in over the last five years, Jacobs Well has also seen a high influx of new residents at 58.9%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,546
- First area, 2016: 1,839
- First area, 2021: 2,882
- Second area, 2011: 3,211
- Second area, 2016: 9,396
- Second area, 2021: 24,601
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 27 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 29 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Jacobs Well: 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Pimpama: 0.1% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Jacobs Well: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Pimpama: 0.3% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Jacobs Well: 1.7% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Pimpama: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Jacobs Well: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 70–74 in Pimpama: 1.1% males, 1.1% females
- 65–69 in Jacobs Well: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 65–69 in Pimpama: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Jacobs Well: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Pimpama: 1.2% males, 1.4% females
- 55–59 in Jacobs Well: 4.0% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Pimpama: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 50–54 in Jacobs Well: 4.8% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Pimpama: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
- 45–49 in Jacobs Well: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Pimpama: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
- 40–44 in Jacobs Well: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Pimpama: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Jacobs Well: 3.3% males, 3.8% females; 35–39 in Pimpama: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
- 30–34 in Jacobs Well: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Pimpama: 5.1% males, 5.8% females
- 25–29 in Jacobs Well: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 25–29 in Pimpama: 5.3% males, 6.1% females
- 20–24 in Jacobs Well: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Pimpama: 3.6% males, 4.3% females
- 15–19 in Jacobs Well: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Pimpama: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Jacobs Well: 3.5% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Pimpama: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Jacobs Well: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Pimpama: 4.9% males, 4.4% females
- 0–4 in Jacobs Well: 3.1% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Pimpama: 5.4% males, 5.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $626
- First area, 2016: $729
- First area, 2021: $903
- Second area, 2011: $702
- Second area, 2016: $750
- Second area, 2021: $856
- First area, 2011: $1,346
- First area, 2016: $1,569
- First area, 2021: $2,127
- Second area, 2011: $1,459
- Second area, 2016: $1,596
- Second area, 2021: $1,863
- First area, 2011: $1,494
- First area, 2016: $1,792
- First area, 2021: $2,215
- Second area, 2011: $1,511
- Second area, 2016: $1,603
- Second area, 2021: $1,906
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $370
- First area, 2021: $465
- Second area, 2011: $365
- Second area, 2016: $410
- Second area, 2021: $440
- First area, 2011: $2,366
- First area, 2016: $1,820
- First area, 2021: $2,141
- Second area, 2011: $2,400
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,978
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Jacobs Well with nearby areas
Compare Pimpama with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Jacobs Well vs Pimpama [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31424/jacobs-well/vs/SAL32318/pimpama